Everyone desires to have a perfect partner for a happy life. Some people prefer to marry a person they are in love with, due to prior understanding and sentimental attachment. While others go for a wealthy spouse, ignoring the temporary pleasure of wealth and ever-growing greed. I strongly support the value of love for a life-long companionship.
First of all, by marrying one’s beloved person lets a person live with whom one has already developed a certain level of understanding. It becomes quite easy to assimilate in a new family setup when a person knows his spouse. For example, awareness of eating habits of husband helps his wife modifying her cooking style. That is why, choosing love for wedlock gives ease of mutual understanding to the couple.
Secondly, loving partners have their sentiments attached to each other which develops a long term relationship based on respect and care. For example, presenting flower to one’s wife is the true depiction of deep emotional connection. For such reasons, love becomes the first choice for several people for their wedding.
On the other hand, marrying someone because of one’s wealth merely gives temporary satisfaction. The reason is maintaining a certain level of richness is not in an individual’s hands and ups and downs are mandatory. For instance, bearing a huge business loss can disturb one’s relationship if based on money. Due to this reason, money-based wedding is nothing more than a short term happiness.
Similarly, avarice is an ever-growing phenomenon. More and more demands cannot always be gratified by a partner that ultimately weakens a materialistic relationship. Owing to such reasons, affluence should never be the first priority for matrimony.
To conclude, some people value prior understanding and emotional attachment, supporting love to make marriage decisions. On the contrary, some prioritize money, forgetting the ephemeral contentment and never-stopping desires. In my opinion, love should always be the top preference to attain long and healthy relationship.
Everyone desires to have a perfect partner for a happy life.
Some
people
prefer to marry a
person
they are in
love
with, due to prior
understanding
and sentimental attachment. While others go for a wealthy spouse, ignoring the temporary pleasure of wealth and ever-growing greed. I
strongly
support the value of
love
for a life-long companionship.
First of all
, by marrying one’s beloved
person
lets
a
person
live
with whom one has already developed a certain level of
understanding
. It becomes quite easy to assimilate in a new family setup when a
person
knows his spouse.
For example
, awareness of eating habits of husband
helps
his wife modifying her cooking style.
That is
why, choosing
love
for wedlock gives
ease
of mutual
understanding
to the couple.
Secondly
, loving partners have their sentiments attached to each other which develops a long term
relationship
based on respect and care.
For example
, presenting flower to one’s wife is the true depiction of deep emotional connection. For such
reasons
,
love
becomes the
first
choice for several
people
for their wedding.
On the other hand
, marrying someone
because
of one’s wealth
merely
gives temporary satisfaction. The
reason
is maintaining a certain level of richness is not in an individual’s hands and ups and downs are mandatory.
For instance
, bearing a huge business loss can disturb one’s
relationship
if based on money. Due to this
reason
, money-based wedding is nothing more than a short term happiness.
Similarly
, avarice is an ever-growing phenomenon. More and more demands cannot always
be gratified
by a partner that
ultimately
weakens a materialistic
relationship
. Owing to such
reasons
, affluence should never be the
first
priority for matrimony.
To conclude
,
some
people
value prior
understanding
and emotional attachment, supporting
love
to
make
marriage decisions.
On the contrary
,
some
prioritize money, forgetting the ephemeral contentment and never-stopping desires. In my opinion,
love
should always be the top preference to attain long and healthy
relationship
.