It is often thought by myriad of people that bureaucrats should financially give support to art and cultural activities, however, others claimed that it is the responsibilities of the authority to invest amount in salient things such as on education and hospital. Different people has distinct mindset. In this essay, I would elucidate both the approaches, and also discuss why it is better to spend money on other essential projects which helps the country to growth.
To commence with the first notion that masses believe authority should invest in creativity and culture. First and foremost, investing in these skills is beneficial for economy of the nation. Creativity and imagination enhance the beauty of the provenance. Consequently, more tourists show their interest to visit country and has profound impact on financial status as they pay enormous money for travel and accommodation while visit. Secondly, another major benefits is job employment, which is highest concern of the individuals these days. If government spend more money in art museum and cultural activities then it creates more job offer. For instance, in UK, 70% people are working in art museum resulting reduce the problem of poverty and crime which are basically increasing due to unemployment.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, denizens believe to bureaucrats should spend on other useful or important projects such as health care system and on education. Owing to hectic schedule and a sedentary lifestyle people do not get enough time to do physical exercise and workout which can directly lead to health hurdles. Thus, it is better to invest money on hospitals or organize campaign to provide the knowledge of detrimental affects sedentary life schedule. Moreover, spending money on education system is also essential for the governments so that more and more denizens get the education. Hence, these are the sectors in which authority should invest.
Having discussed both arguments and counterarguments, I would like to infer that there are lots of other factors where government can spend the money such as hospitals and schools. A google study shows the if government spend money on these places then it enhance the economy as well as reputation of the nation.
To conclude, although many people believe that arts and culture is important for our future and regime should spend on it, but it is fruitful for the nation if bureaucrats financially support to hospitals and schools.
It is
often
thought
by myriad of
people
that bureaucrats should
financially
give support to
art
and cultural activities,
however
, others claimed that it is the responsibilities of the authority to invest amount in salient things such as on
education
and
hospital
.
Different
people
has
distinct mindset. In this essay, I would elucidate both the approaches, and
also
discuss why it is better to
spend
money
on
other
essential projects which
helps
the country to growth.
To commence with the
first
notion that masses believe authority should invest in creativity and culture.
First
and foremost, investing in these
skills
is beneficial for economy of the nation. Creativity and imagination enhance the beauty of the provenance.
Consequently
, more tourists
show
their interest to visit country and has profound impact on financial status as they pay enormous
money
for travel and accommodation while visit.
Secondly
, another major benefits is job employment, which is
highest
concern of the individuals these days. If
government
spend
more
money
in
art
museum and cultural activities then it creates more job offer.
For instance
, in UK, 70%
people
are working in
art
museum resulting
reduce
the problem of poverty and crime which are
basically
increasing due to unemployment.
Shifting towards the second school of
thought
, denizens
believe to
bureaucrats should
spend
on
other
useful or
important
projects such as health care system and on
education
. Owing to hectic schedule and a sedentary lifestyle
people
do not
get
enough
time to do physical exercise and workout which can
directly
lead to health hurdles.
Thus
, it is better to invest
money
on
hospitals
or organize campaign to provide the knowledge of detrimental affects sedentary life schedule.
Moreover
, spending
money
on
education
system is
also
essential for the
governments
so
that more and more denizens
get
the
education
.
Hence
, these are the sectors in which authority should invest.
Having discussed both arguments and counterarguments, I would like to infer that there are lots of
other
factors where
government
can
spend
the
money
such as
hospitals
and schools. A
google
study
shows
the if
government
spend
money
on these places then it
enhance
the economy
as well
as reputation of the nation.
To conclude
, although
many
people
believe that
arts
and culture is
important
for our future and regime should
spend
on it,
but
it is fruitful for the nation if bureaucrats
financially
support to
hospitals
and schools.