Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that media (newspapers) should publish information of people's private lives. While, others think newspaper should be controlled so that they don't publish news on people's lives. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that media (newspapers) should publish information of people's private lives. While, others think newspaper should be controlled so that they don't publish news on people's lives. PVGad
Many people believe that in the newspaper, people's personal life can be discussed while others argue that they should be stopped in publishing such information. However, I believe that the mass media should be controlled by the government so that they respect the privacy of each individual and publish what is required. Let us delve deeper into this issue in the upcoming paragraphs. On the one hand, publishing news about artists and actors is good for their fans and followers. As the youth today considers sports persons, politicians and actors as their role model, getting a glimpse of their personal activity is not harmful in any way. The difference between the artists reel and real life can be depicted through media and news. For example, if media publish the struggle behind the success of any celebrity, it will motivate the youth to work harder and achieve their goals. Moreover, we get to know the political leader's social activity through the media which helps us to decide whether that politician is capable to rule or not. Conversely, I believe that the public should not forget that the celebrities and politicians are also human beings who deserve some privacy. First of all, Invading people's personal growth can lead to insecurities. As many public figures have opponents and enemies, publishing private information can have detrimental effects on their careers. For instance, Sushant Singh, a Bollywood celebrity committed suicide after being in a depression for several months because media published his personal activities. Therefore, the overall productivity of the artist will increase when there is no such conflict. In conclusion, while there are arguments in favour of mass media, publishing people's private life, I believe that the media should not invade people's privacy for entertaining or profitable purposes, and the government should take action if media publish any inappropriate content.
Many
people
believe
that in the newspaper,
people's
personal
life can
be discussed
while others argue that they should be
stopped
in
publishing
such information.
However
, I
believe
that the mass
media
should
be controlled
by the
government
so
that they respect the privacy of each individual and publish what
is required
.
Let
us delve deeper into this issue in the upcoming paragraphs.

On the one hand,
publishing
news about artists and actors is
good
for their fans and followers. As the youth
today
considers sports persons, politicians and actors as their role model, getting a glimpse of their
personal
activity is not harmful in any way. The difference between the artists reel and real life can
be depicted
through
media
and news.
For example
, if
media
publish the struggle behind the success of any celebrity, it will motivate the youth to work harder and achieve their goals.
Moreover
, we
get
to know the political leader's social activity through the
media
which
helps
us to decide whether that politician is capable to
rule
or not.

Conversely
, I
believe
that the public should not forget that the celebrities and politicians are
also
human beings who deserve
some
privacy.
First of all
, Invading
people's
personal
growth can lead to insecurities. As
many
public figures have opponents and enemies,
publishing
private information can have detrimental effects on their careers.
For instance
,
Sushant
Singh, a Bollywood celebrity committed suicide after being in a depression for several months
because
media
published his
personal
activities.
Therefore
, the
overall
productivity of the artist will increase when there is no such conflict.

In conclusion
, while there are arguments in
favour
of mass
media
,
publishing
people's
private life, I
believe
that the
media
should not invade
people's
privacy for entertaining or profitable purposes, and the
government
should take action if
media
publish any inappropriate content.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that media (newspapers) should publish information of people's private lives. While, others think newspaper should be controlled so that they don't publish news on people's lives.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
306 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts