Owing to the growing popularity of sports activity, most nations arranging global athletic contests. In this scenario, one school of thought proffers it is up to the mark to the nation while skeptics advocate it makes a terrible impact. This essay delves into both opposite arguments and the reasons for my inclination are articulated in trail paragraph.
In the inception, it is an irrefutable fact that the government can generate the revenue from sports events and that can be used in various countries developments from improving transportation to removing poverty. If the nation invites top sports players from all across the world to play in their country, then it attracts many sports freak people, and increasing publicity may create more money for the nation. As an example, in my country, India, the government invites the NBA which is an international tournament of basketball also they arrange many international tournaments of cricket and kabbadi that lure more players and audience from the world and indirectly it generates more revenue to my nation. I believe that any international sports tournaments are indispensable to improve a country's wealth.
In sharp contrast, although sports events can be fruitful for the nation, they can also cause some economical damage to the country that can not be negligible. There are many other rampant issues in nations, and in this case, rather than initiating sports events, developments in other sectors are vital. Organizing these types of events may beneficial to law-enforcement agencies, but it can not affect the middle class and poor class people. Improving their quality of life has to be the first step of any country.
In conclusion, there are several ramifications of hosting worldwide sports events, however, that can be solved by money which is earned by arranging sports events.
Owing to the growing popularity of
sports
activity, most
nations
arranging global athletic contests. In this scenario, one school of
thought
proffers it is up to the mark to the
nation
while skeptics advocate it
makes
a terrible impact. This essay delves into both opposite arguments and the reasons for my inclination
are articulated
in trail paragraph.
In the inception, it is an irrefutable fact that the
government
can generate the revenue from
sports
events
and that can be
used
in various
countries
developments from improving transportation to removing poverty. If the
nation
invites top
sports
players from all across the world to play in their
country
, then it attracts
many
sports
freak
people
, and increasing publicity may create more money for the
nation
. As an example, in my
country
, India, the
government
invites the NBA which is an international tournament of basketball
also
they arrange
many
international tournaments of cricket and
kabbadi
that lure more players and audience from the world and
indirectly
it generates more revenue to my
nation
. I believe that any international
sports
tournaments are indispensable to
improve
a country's wealth.
In sharp contrast, although
sports
events
can be fruitful for the
nation
, they can
also
cause
some
economical damage to the
country
that can not be negligible. There are
many
other rampant issues in
nations
, and
in this case
,
rather
than initiating
sports
events
, developments in other sectors are vital. Organizing these types of
events
may beneficial to law-enforcement agencies,
but
it can not affect the middle
class
and poor
class
people
. Improving their quality of life
has to
be the
first
step of any country.
In conclusion
, there are several ramifications of hosting worldwide
sports
events
,
however
, that can
be solved
by money which
is earned
by arranging
sports
events
.