Hosting an international sports event is good/bad based on the country which is hosting the country. As not all countries were the same, the factors on deciding the good/bad on hosting the event varies widely.
The most important factors like GDP income of the country, the sports budget, sportmen participation from the country, percentage of population interested in sports.
Now lets discuss each factor exclusively.
The GDP income of the country shows the economic status of the country indirectly tells above the amount which they can spend in hosting the event, as this is a costly affair.
The sports budget says the priority of sports in the country.
The sportmen participation from the country tells the seriousness of the sport in the country.
The percentage of population interested in sports either viewing or playing. This can be calculated by conducting a survey or an opinion poll.
Coming to the types of countries which comes under the positive sector in terms of hosting an international sports event. The country should have a good GDP as well as a good sports budget, if it cannot spend on an event then its not going to make any good in hosting an event in a limited budget and bad hostage. Some countries wants to show to the world how good they are at hosting such events making it a matter of pride. Secondly, if there is king-size participation of sportmen from the hosting country makes a good impact in many ways. If the country's citizen weren't interested in the sports events then how about viewership, as it cannot be filled totally from the visitors from other countries.
Now the hosting can also make a country bad if it cannot fulfill the needs of the sportmen, security is utmost priority.
Hosting
an international
sports
event
is
good
/
bad
based on the
country
which is
hosting
the
country
. As not all
countries
were the same, the factors on deciding the
good
/
bad
on
hosting
the
event
varies
widely
.
The most
important
factors like GDP income of the
country
, the
sports
budget
,
sportmen
participation from the
country
, percentage of population interested in sports.
Now
lets
discuss each factor exclusively.
The GDP income of the
country
shows
the economic status of the
country
indirectly
tells
above the amount which they can spend in
hosting
the
event
, as this is a costly affair.
The
sports
budget
says the priority of
sports
in the country.
The
sportmen
participation from the
country
tells
the seriousness of the
sport
in the country.
The
percentage of population interested in
sports
either viewing or playing. This can
be calculated
by conducting a survey or an opinion poll.
Coming to the types of
countries
which
comes
under the
positive
sector in terms of
hosting
an international
sports
event
. The
country
should have a
good
GDP
as well
as a
good
sports
budget
, if it cannot spend on an
event
then
its
not going to
make
any
good
in
hosting
an
event
in a limited
budget
and
bad
hostage.
Some
countries
wants
to
show
to the world how
good
they are at
hosting
such
events
making it a matter of pride.
Secondly
, if there is king-size participation of
sportmen
from the
hosting
country
makes
a
good
impact in
many
ways. If the country's citizen weren't interested in the
sports
events
then how about viewership, as it cannot
be filled
totally
from the visitors from other countries.
Now
the
hosting
can
also
make
a
country
bad
if it cannot fulfill the needs of the
sportmen
, security is utmost priority.