In recent years, environmental issues such as pollution and endangered fauna and flora have been controversial around the world. Some people assume that these problems could be solved by the governments and large enterprises, not civils, while others argue that the public’s help have been necessary to go through taking these hard problems. In this essay, I will elaborate on both aspects caused by advances in human lives and discuss my idea.
To begin with, as contamination figure, the ordinary amount of polluted natural resources has reasoned by huge corporations rather than individual family. In other words, it is more of the giant companies have responsibility to alleviate environmental pollution. That is because, it is more effectively that the local government regulate the industrial agencies’ natural material usage. In addition, as endangered species side, the public could not affect useful movement. Whereas if the universal businesses operate various campaigns about preserving animal living areas, these could bring positive influences which involved in personal spontaneous attendance. Therefore, the local governments and related promotions have plenty of impacts on environment issues, but individual effects are minor.
However, it is undeniable that personal efforts are necessary as well. Following are the reasons. First, for success of reusing and recycling, the recycling system needs to the public’s effort. That is because, individual house dumping is big impact on contaminated environment that is cost-ineffective to revise by the company’s infrastructure. Second, traffic congestion which is culprit of polluted air could reduce by civic cooperation. When the public utilizes public transportations, without private cars during commuting time. This movement absolutely could help to decline air contamination. Hence, ordinary people have citizen consciousness for addressing those matters.
In conclusion, as mentioned above, these issues require both groups’ landing their helping hands. Thus, I suggest that the public and relevant enterprises need to integrate together rather than discussing who could decrease environment pollutions.
In recent years, environmental issues such as pollution and endangered fauna and flora have been controversial around the world.
Some
people
assume that these problems could
be solved
by the
governments
and large enterprises, not
civils
, while others argue that the
public’s
help
have been necessary to go through taking these
hard
problems. In this essay, I will elaborate on both aspects caused by advances in human
lives
and discuss my
idea
.
To
begin
with, as contamination figure, the ordinary amount of polluted natural resources has reasoned by huge corporations
rather
than individual family.
In other words
, it is more of the giant
companies
have responsibility to alleviate environmental pollution.
That is
because
, it is more
effectively
that the local
government
regulate the industrial agencies’ natural material usage.
In addition
, as endangered species side, the
public
could not affect useful movement. Whereas if the universal businesses operate various campaigns about preserving animal living areas, these could bring
positive
influences which involved in personal spontaneous attendance.
Therefore
, the local
governments
and related promotions have
plenty
of impacts on environment issues,
but
individual effects are minor.
However
, it is undeniable that personal efforts are necessary
as well
. Following are the reasons.
First
, for success of reusing and recycling, the recycling system needs to the
public’s
effort.
That is
because
, individual
house
dumping is
big
impact on contaminated environment that
is cost
-ineffective to revise by the
company
’s infrastructure. Second, traffic congestion which is culprit of polluted air could
reduce
by civic cooperation. When the
public
utilizes
public
transportations, without private cars during commuting time. This movement
absolutely
could
help
to decline air contamination.
Hence
, ordinary
people
have citizen consciousness for addressing those matters.
In conclusion
, as mentioned above, these issues require both groups’ landing their helping hands.
Thus
, I suggest that the
public
and relevant enterprises need to integrate together
rather
than discussing who could decrease environment pollutions.