Nowadays, it is said that human waste is the greatest threat to the planet. Some belive that educational institute should be learn about recyling and avoiding waste to thie pupils, whereas, another group of thinkers support, it should be learn by teach by their parents at homr. However, both has its own pros and cons. Therefore, before commenting on my decision, both the opinion would be discussed in ensuing paragraphs.
Examining the former opinuon, the primary argument the supporters would put forward is, schools are significant in imbibing these moral values can argue that children will learn from professionals teachers. This is because, teachers can explain benifits and importance of recycling and drawbacks of waste more efficiently. In addition, they also believe that schools have specific subjects, which explain the damage done by the waste and what can be done to reduce it. For instance, in geography subject pictures and graphs are used to explain the problem of waste and different ways of recycling is given. Therefore, schools can ve of great value in teaching the importance of recycling and reducing the waste.
On the contrary, the latter view suggest that children spend more time with their psrents at home and more waste is produced at home. Because of this, parents can easily gives practical knowledge about recycle and avoiding waste. Infact, when parents can put recycle products like glass and water bottle in recycle dustbin then children follws and copy it from their parents. As a result, youngster easliy learn to kepp away from waste and recyling some products.
To conclude and gove my opinion, I would opine that balancing both the view is most logical and i would say that parents as well as teachers both have responsibility to learn children about avoiding waste and recyling materials because it is good for not only human being but also for our planet.
Nowadays, it
is said
that human
waste
is the greatest threat to the planet.
Some
belive
that educational institute should be
learn
about
recyling
and avoiding
waste
to
thie
pupils, whereas, another group of thinkers support, it should be
learn
by teach by their
parents
at
homr
.
However
, both has its
own
pros and cons.
Therefore
,
before
commenting on my decision, both the opinion would
be discussed
in ensuing paragraphs.
Examining the former
opinuon
, the primary argument the supporters would put forward is, schools are significant in imbibing these moral values can argue that
children
will
learn
from professionals teachers. This is
because
, teachers can
explain
benifits
and importance of recycling and drawbacks of
waste
more
efficiently
.
In addition
, they
also
believe that schools have specific subjects, which
explain
the damage done by the
waste
and what can
be done
to
reduce
it.
For instance
, in geography subject pictures and graphs are
used
to
explain
the problem of
waste
and
different
ways of recycling is
given
.
Therefore
, schools can ve of great value in teaching the importance of recycling and reducing the waste.
On the contrary
, the latter view suggest that
children
spend more time with their
psrents
at home and more
waste
is produced
at home.
Because of this
,
parents
can
easily
gives practical knowledge about recycle and avoiding
waste
.
Infact
, when
parents
can put recycle products like glass and water bottle in recycle dustbin then
children
follws
and copy it from their
parents
.
As a result
, youngster
easliy
learn
to
kepp
away from
waste
and
recyling
some
products.
To conclude
and
gove
my opinion, I would opine that balancing both the view is most logical and
i
would say that
parents
as well
as teachers both have responsibility to
learn
children
about avoiding
waste
and
recyling
materials
because
it is
good
for not
only
human being
but
also
for our planet.