Plethora of people opine that university students by perusing studies in the area of interests becomes passionate and brings the best out of them while, number of other people feel they must study futuristic and carrier oriented subjects like science and technology. However, I firmly believe that if allowed, undergraduates may outperform in their chosen field of study in comparison to the ones made force to choose future associated subjects.
On one hand, pupil grow up passionate and confident about things which interests them as not only they indulges themselves grossly but also they get fond of it. Moreover, encouraging and supporting them to carry on with chosen area boosts their excitement to next level. Additionally, in this creative world, monetising modern art and skills is a new trend. So, skills can not only bring you money but also make your carrier. To illustrate, a sophomore out of interest participated in swimming competition and eventually ended up playing Olympics and Common wealth games representing his country.
On the contrary, few parents push their children to opt for science and technological related subjects for the sake of future. Furthermore, teens suffer from the trauma of lectures and progresses without getting essence of the subject matter. While, few may end up getting placements, they drastically fall in their carrier as they are never satisfied with their jobs. For example, when a hater of biology ends up being a doctor, he may be charged for endangering lives by being irresponsible. Also, some may jeopardise their life if they don’t feel lively in what they do.
To conclude, it will be best for students and society if undergraduates are allowed to study in their chosen field instead of forcing them or rather allowing them to only study science and technology as it may give them upper hand over others gradually. 
Plethora of  
people
 opine that university students by perusing  
studies
 in the area of interests becomes passionate and brings the best out of them while, number of other  
people
 feel they  
must
  study
 futuristic and carrier oriented subjects like science and technology.  
However
, I  
firmly
 believe that if  
allowed
, undergraduates may outperform in their chosen field of  
study
  in comparison
 to the ones made force to choose future associated subjects.
On one hand, pupil grow up passionate and confident about things which interests them as not  
only
 they  
indulges
 themselves  
grossly
  but
  also
 they  
get
 fond of it.  
Moreover
, encouraging and supporting them to carry on with chosen area boosts their excitement to  
next
 level.  
Additionally
, in this creative world,  
monetising
 modern art and  
skills
 is a new trend.  
So
,  
skills
 can not  
only
 bring you money  
but
  also
  make
 your carrier. To illustrate, a sophomore out of interest participated in swimming competition and  
eventually
 ended up playing Olympics and Common wealth games representing his country. 
On the contrary
, few parents push their children to opt for science and technological related subjects for the sake of future.  
Furthermore
, teens suffer from the trauma of lectures and progresses without getting essence of the  
subject matter
. While,  
few may
  end
 up getting placements, they  
drastically
 fall in their carrier as they are never satisfied with their jobs.  
For example
, when a hater of biology ends up being a doctor, he may  
be charged
 for endangering  
lives
 by being irresponsible.  
Also
,  
some
 may  
jeopardise
 their life if they don’t feel lively in what they do. 
To conclude
, it will be best for students and society if undergraduates are  
allowed
 to  
study
 in their chosen field  
instead
 of forcing them or  
rather
 allowing them to  
only
  study
 science and technology as it may give them upper hand over others  
gradually
.