It is a debatable issue about how we select our peers. Some people believe that friendship should be among like-minded people while others think just the opposite. In my opinion, I favor selecting peers having the same viewpoint. I favor the colleagues having the same viewpoint. This essay will first discuss that mutual understanding aids in the smooth completion of a task and then discuss the strategic importance of making perfect discussion while considering different ideas. (with different ideas)
On one hand, it is easy to control a group of people sharing similar views. To accomplish a program, the positive contribution from these people helps to achieve the target effortlessly. Moreover, the integrity of the group and satisfaction is not compromised. For instance, an article in the Times of India on real estate business showed that 88% of the agents shared the common goal. Therefore, a crystal clear destiny is seen where there is a single roof.
On the other hand, there is a benefit of having groups of people who uniquely exhibit their logic. This is the reason why hoi polloi are given a moment of actualization about the subject and it enables them to see the matter in depth. Consequently, it allows making a solid conclusion. For example, in various corporate sectors, 50% of the individual have different thoughts but these ideas bring up the organization to the top. So, the opposite views are vital for making the right decision as the arguments refine the products. Although different opinions help the institute reach a better place when people have similar viewpoints and goals, it will have more impact on the understanding of an organization.
In summation, mutual understanding is sufficient to grow and development of a project but passing several opinions on a topic results in a pristine solution.
It is a debatable issue about how we select our peers.
Some
people
believe that friendship should be among like-minded
people
while others
think
just
the opposite. In my opinion, I favor selecting peers having the same viewpoint. I favor the colleagues having the same viewpoint. This essay will
first
discuss that mutual understanding aids in the smooth completion of a task and then discuss the strategic importance of making perfect discussion while considering
different
ideas
. (with
different
ideas
)
On one hand, it is easy to control a group of
people
sharing similar views. To accomplish a program, the
positive
contribution from these
people
helps
to achieve the target
effortlessly
.
Moreover
, the integrity of the group and satisfaction is not compromised.
For instance
, an article in
the Times of India
on real estate business
showed
that 88% of the agents shared the common goal.
Therefore
, a crystal
clear
destiny is
seen
where there is a single roof.
On the other hand
, there is a benefit of having groups of
people
who
uniquely
exhibit their logic. This is the reason why hoi polloi are
given
a moment of actualization about the subject and it enables them to
see
the matter in depth.
Consequently
, it
allows
making a solid conclusion.
For example
, in various corporate sectors, 50% of the individual have
different
thoughts
but
these
ideas
bring up the organization to the top.
So
, the opposite views are vital for making the right decision as the arguments refine the products. Although
different
opinions
help
the institute reach a better place when
people
have similar viewpoints and goals, it will have more impact on the understanding of an organization.
In summation, mutual understanding is sufficient to grow and development of a project
but
passing several opinions on a topic results in a pristine solution.