Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, government should increase the tax on the petrol (gasoline). Would there is more benefits than the drawback?

Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, government should increase the tax on the petrol (gasoline). Would there is more benefits than the drawback? do912
Technology has revolutionized our lifestyles and brought us modern vehicles, however, fuel-driven engines are producing noxious gas to the environment. Some people believe that government should raise the excise on gasoline in order to resolve the problem that is caused by traffic and pollution. I personally believe that there are more advantages than disadvantage. One of the greatest advantages of increasing the gas tax is to reduce the overall amount of drivers. A considerable expenditure can effectively affect some individuals before they decide to drive. Most potential car owners nowadays can afford the price of purchasing a car, but the maintenance fee including the fueling budget is one of the biggest concerns before they decide to make the deal. By increasing the tax, it can effectively control the number of future vehicle buyers. Another benefit is that higher tax produces more revenue, and the government can, therefore, be able to invest in the research of environmentally friendly resource. In fact, nowadays the electrical engine-driven vehicles are getting popular, however, the recharging facilities are not as developed as the gas stations. The government can build more recharging sites and reduce pollution to a great extent. However, there is a major side effect of raising the tax that is the heavier burden of public transport. Some people might consider taking the metro or buses instead of driving once the tax is increased which can lead to the number of passengers skyrockets and puts a toll on the existing public transportation system. Metro in Shanghai is a typical example, in which there are more than 50 million people getting on and off every day. The government must be well prepared for such a tremendous number. In conclusion, raising the tax on gasoline can effectively reduce the number of car owners as the increased fueling fee, and build up more facilities to support the e-vehicles to diminish pollution. However, an exploding population on public transport can be one of the severe consequences.
Technology has revolutionized our lifestyles and brought us modern vehicles,
however
, fuel-driven engines are producing noxious gas to the environment.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should raise the excise on gasoline in order to resolve the problem that
is caused
by traffic and pollution. I
personally
believe that there are more advantages than disadvantage.

One of the greatest advantages of increasing the gas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
is to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
overall
amount of drivers. A considerable expenditure can
effectively
affect
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
individuals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they decide to drive. Most potential car owners nowadays can afford the price of purchasing a car,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the maintenance fee including the fueling budget is one of the biggest concerns
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they decide to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the deal. By increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
, it can
effectively
control the number of future vehicle buyers.

Another benefit is that higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
produces more revenue, and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can,
therefore
, be able to invest in the research of
environmentally
friendly resource. In fact, nowadays the electrical engine-driven vehicles are getting popular,
however
, the recharging facilities are not as developed as the gas stations. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can build more recharging sites and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
pollution to a great extent.

However
, there is a major side effect of raising the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
that is
the heavier burden of public transport.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
might consider taking the metro or buses
instead
of driving once the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
is increased
which can lead to the number of passengers skyrockets and puts a toll on the existing public transportation system. Metro in Shanghai is a typical example, in which there are more than 50 million
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
getting on and off every day. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
well prepared
for such a tremendous number.

In conclusion
, raising the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on gasoline can
effectively
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the number of car owners as the increased fueling fee, and build up more facilities to support the e-vehicles to diminish pollution.
However
, an exploding population on public transport can be one of the severe consequences.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, government should increase the tax on the petrol (gasoline). Would there is more benefits than the drawback?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
328 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, government should increase the tax on the petrol (gasoline). Would there is more benefits than the drawback?