Some individuals are arguing at length that in advanced IT phase, it is an everyday phenomenon that up-to-date devices, such as smart phones and laptops, busy teens for much time a day. In contrast, some opponents of this view highlight that this habit affects them negatively. In the following paragraph, I intend to state strong points of both positions and provide my personal judgement.
Supporters of the idea think that spending many hours of using modern gadgets helps teenagers to be aware of news along world since current life requests to become a cyber activist. For example, we have to utilize laptops or appliances connected to the internet in order to be online on such social medias as Facebook and Instagram which share news related to all categories like sport, society, economy and others. Therefore, most young are nowadays trying more to use modern gadgets than to be busy with others.
Albeit knowing that it is impossible to limit the time the young pass using newfangled appliances, opponents intend to warn that it impacts seriously users’ health system if they spend lots of time on the devices. For instance, because most teens use their smart phones with maximum brightness, they unintentionally damage their eyes. As a result, their sight ability may diminish. Additionally, while they pass their time utilizing gadgets, they do not know that they are being addicted to cyber world and becoming a captive of it. Actually, it is a bad condition and also influences teens psychologically. Such as, they feel weird, lonely and isolated from society, and this is bad troubled statement for young generation.
To sum up, I should state that the less teens use modern devices, the healthier they are, and negative effects never can be dominance.
Some
individuals are arguing at length that in advanced IT phase, it is an everyday phenomenon that up-to-date devices, such as smart phones and laptops, busy
teens
for much
time
a day.
In contrast
,
some
opponents of this view highlight that this habit affects them
negatively
. In the following paragraph, I intend to state strong points of both positions and provide my personal judgement.
Supporters of the
idea
think
that spending
many
hours of using modern gadgets
helps
teenagers
to be aware of news along world since
current
life requests to become a cyber activist.
For example
, we
have to
utilize laptops or appliances connected to the internet in order to be online on such social medias as Facebook and Instagram which share news related to all categories like sport, society, economy
and others
.
Therefore
, most young are nowadays trying more to
use
modern gadgets than to be busy with others.
Albeit knowing that it is impossible to limit the
time
the young pass using newfangled appliances, opponents intend to warn that it impacts
seriously
users’ health system if they spend lots of
time
on the devices.
For instance
,
because
most
teens
use
their smart phones with maximum brightness, they
unintentionally
damage their eyes.
As a result
, their sight ability may diminish.
Additionally
, while they pass their
time
utilizing gadgets, they do not know that they are
being addicted
to cyber world and becoming a captive of it. Actually, it is a
bad
condition and
also
influences
teens
psychologically
. Such as, they feel weird, lonely and isolated from society, and this is
bad
troubled statement for young generation.
To sum up, I should state that the
less
teens
use
modern devices, the healthier they are, and
negative
effects never can be dominance.