It is often argued that the number of holidays awarded to employees should be in accordance with the nature of their job. I fully agree with this view.
Some jobs are physically and emotionally more taxing than other jobs. For example, people working in the armed forces require more holidays. Since they are more likely to work in places far away from their home, it is essential to give them a few months of holidays per year. This enables them to spend some time with their family and rejuvenate themselves. Likewise, people working in oil rigs or construction sites need more off days to stay physically and mentally healthy. Hence, it is essential to take into account the nature of the job while determining the amount of holidays each employee should get.
On the flip side, people working in the same office should be given the same number of holidays regardless of their designation provided that the nature of the job is the same. For example, if the manager is given more holidays than lower level employees, it may create resentment among the latter. Also, if the manager or the supervisor goes on holidays too frequently, it will affect the productivity of the organization because of the communication gap between them and other employees. Hence, it is essential to avoid such situations by giving the same number of holidays to all the people whose job requirements are more or less the same.
In conclusion, I agree with the argument that the nature of the job should be the main criterion used for determining the number of holidays each employee gets. Employees performing the same kind of jobs should get the same number of holidays regardless of their position in the organizational hierarchy. 
It is  
often
 argued that the  
number
 of  
holidays
 awarded to  
employees
 should be in accordance with the  
nature
 of their  
job
. I  
fully
  agree
 with this view. 
Some
  jobs
 are  
physically
 and  
emotionally
 more taxing than other  
jobs
.  
For example
,  
people
 working in the armed forces require more  
holidays
. Since they are more likely to work in places far away from their home, it is essential to give them a few months of  
holidays
 per year. This enables them to spend  
some
 time with their family and rejuvenate themselves.  
Likewise
,  
people
 working in oil rigs or construction sites need more off days to stay  
physically
 and mentally healthy.  
Hence
, it is essential to take into account the  
nature
 of the  
job
 while determining the amount of  
holidays
 each  
employee
 should  
get
.
On the flip side,  
people
 working in the same office should be  
given
 the same  
number
 of  
holidays
 regardless of their designation provided that the  
nature
 of the  
job
 is the same.  
For example
, if the manager is  
given
 more  
holidays
 than lower level  
employees
, it may create resentment among the latter.  
Also
, if the manager or the supervisor goes on  
holidays
 too  
frequently
, it will affect the productivity of the organization  
because
 of the communication gap between them and other  
employees
.  
Hence
, it is essential to avoid such situations by giving the same  
number
 of  
holidays
 to all the  
people
 whose  
job
 requirements are more or less the same. 
In conclusion
, I  
agree
 with the argument that the  
nature
 of the  
job
 should be the main criterion  
used
 for determining the  
number
 of  
holidays
 each  
employee
  gets
.  
Employees
 performing the same kind of  
jobs
 should  
get
 the same  
number
 of  
holidays
 regardless of their position in the organizational hierarchy.