It is often argued that the number of holidays awarded to employees should be in accordance with the nature of their job. I fully agree with this view.
Some jobs are physically and emotionally more taxing than other jobs. For example, people working in the armed forces require more holidays. Since they are more likely to work in places far away from their home, it is essential to give them a few months of holidays per year. This enables them to spend some time with their family and rejuvenate themselves. Likewise, people working in oil rigs or construction sites need more off days to stay physically and mentally healthy. Hence, it is essential to take into account the nature of the job while determining the amount of holidays each employee should get.
On the flip side, people working in the same office should be given the same number of holidays regardless of their designation provided that the nature of the job is the same. For example, if the manager is given more holidays than lower level employees, it may create resentment among the latter. Also, if the manager or the supervisor goes on holidays too frequently, it will affect the productivity of the organization because of the communication gap between them and other employees. Hence, it is essential to avoid such situations by giving the same number of holidays to all the people whose job requirements are more or less the same.
In conclusion, I agree with the argument that the nature of the job should be the main criterion used for determining the number of holidays each employee gets. Employees performing the same kind of jobs should get the same number of holidays regardless of their position in the organizational hierarchy.
It is
often
argued that the
number
of
holidays
awarded to
employees
should be in accordance with the
nature
of their
job
. I
fully
agree
with this view.
Some
jobs
are
physically
and
emotionally
more taxing than other
jobs
.
For example
,
people
working in the armed forces require more
holidays
. Since they are more likely to work in places far away from their home, it is essential to give them a few months of
holidays
per year. This enables them to spend
some
time with their family and rejuvenate themselves.
Likewise
,
people
working in oil rigs or construction sites need more off days to stay
physically
and mentally healthy.
Hence
, it is essential to take into account the
nature
of the
job
while determining the amount of
holidays
each
employee
should
get
.
On the flip side,
people
working in the same office should be
given
the same
number
of
holidays
regardless of their designation provided that the
nature
of the
job
is the same.
For example
, if the manager is
given
more
holidays
than lower level
employees
, it may create resentment among the latter.
Also
, if the manager or the supervisor goes on
holidays
too
frequently
, it will affect the productivity of the organization
because
of the communication gap between them and other
employees
.
Hence
, it is essential to avoid such situations by giving the same
number
of
holidays
to all the
people
whose
job
requirements are more or less the same.
In conclusion
, I
agree
with the argument that the
nature
of the
job
should be the main criterion
used
for determining the
number
of
holidays
each
employee
gets
.
Employees
performing the same kind of
jobs
should
get
the same
number
of
holidays
regardless of their position in the organizational hierarchy.