A group of people choose not to eat fleshy food such as meat or fish as they think that it is beneficial for their health as well as for others. Personally, I differ with this mindset and consider that animals are for the benefit of humans, and rightly to be used in limits.
A school of thought considers that eating fleshy food is not only useful for their own health, but also for the whole world. They believe that eating meat means killing someone, which is unethical and immoral. Because they will ultimately vanish from the face of the world, we must not kill them merely for eating purposes. Normally, they prefer eating vegetable foods as they believe it is advantageous for their health and saving the beautiful creature for the remaining world. Various religions, for instance, have a different set of rules for eating some permit eating flesh while others do not. Taking an innocent life, therefore, for food should be stopped.
In my opinion, I think that these foods are more proteinaceous than vegetables and are for the benefit of human’s health to be eaten. In order to have a healthy digestive system, humans ought to be fed with these types of foods otherwise we need to take pills for them. Also, the argument that it involves killing a life is not making much sense because a plant has a life and cooking them also involves killing a living organism. However, it should be kept in mind that we should not cross the think red line. For example, some countries have banned hunting at all while others allowed them but have rules for different types of birds, which are not meant to be killed as they are rare. Thus, to be the beneficiary of nature, the human should appropriately use animals.
In conclusion, while some people argue that not eating meat is better for their own health and is also for the betterment of the world, I believe that animal meat ought to eat as they contain essential proteins and vitamins required for humans.
A group of
people
choose not to eat fleshy
food
such as
meat
or fish as they
think
that it is beneficial for their
health
as well
as for others.
Personally
, I differ with this mindset and consider that animals are for the benefit of
humans
, and
rightly
to be
used
in limits.
A school of
thought
considers that
eating
fleshy
food
is not
only
useful for their
own
health
,
but
also
for the whole
world
. They believe that
eating
meat
means killing someone, which is unethical and immoral.
Because
they will
ultimately
vanish from the face of the
world
, we
must
not kill them
merely
for
eating
purposes.
Normally
, they prefer
eating
vegetable
foods
as they believe it is advantageous for their
health
and saving the
beautiful
creature for the remaining
world
. Various religions,
for instance
, have a
different
set of
rules
for
eating
some
permit
eating
flesh while others do not. Taking an innocent life,
therefore
, for
food
should be
stopped
.
In my opinion, I
think
that these
foods
are more
proteinaceous
than vegetables and are for the benefit of
human’s
health
to
be eaten
. In order to have a healthy digestive system,
humans
ought to
be fed
with these types of
foods
otherwise
we need to take pills for them.
Also
, the argument that it involves killing a life is not making much sense
because
a plant has a life and cooking them
also
involves killing a living organism.
However
, it should be
kept
in mind that we should not cross the
think
red line.
For example
,
some
countries have banned hunting at all while others
allowed
them
but
have
rules
for
different
types of birds, which are not meant to
be killed
as they are rare.
Thus
, to be the beneficiary of nature, the
human
should
appropriately
use
animals.
In conclusion
, while
some
people
argue that not
eating
meat
is better for their
own
health
and is
also
for the betterment of the
world
, I believe that animal
meat
ought to eat as they contain essential proteins and vitamins required for
humans
.