Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state

As per my view, using animals to test the safety of human medicines is not at all cruel and unwarranted. In order to carry out medical experiments or tests, we need to perform the test on the animals first rather than to perform the tests straightaway on humans. Before carrying out the tests on animals, we need to make sure that proper measures are being taken. It shouldn't be like you carry out certain tests on animals and later on they have to lose their life as the experiment failed. Normally, scientists carry out the tests on the animals to check how they respond once they are tested with the medicines. As per my opinion, this is the only option scientists have. If experiments are carried out directly on humans and if the experiment fails, they can easily lose their life. It can even lead to certain side-effects. No doubt animals too have their own life, but later on if the experiment fails, we can save their life. It has happened in the past that certain medicines have responded well on the animals but they haven't responded well on the humans. Even certain Covid-19 vaccines responded well on the animals but they were not as successful on the humans. Hence, I believe that it is not at all cruel to carry out the tests of human medicines on the animals.
As per my view, using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
the safety of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
medicines is not at all cruel and unwarranted. In order to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carry
out medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
, we need to perform the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
first
rather
than to perform the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
straightaway on humans.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Before
carrying out the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, we need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
sure that proper measures are
being taken
. It shouldn't be like you
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carry
out
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
certain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and later on they
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
lose their
Did you mean “lives”?
life
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
failed.
Normally
, scientists
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carry
out the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
how they respond once they are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
with the medicines. As per my opinion, this is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
option scientists have.

If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
are carried
out
directly
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
and if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
fails, they can
easily
lose their
Did you mean “lives”?
life
. It can even lead to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
certain
Did you mean “side effects” (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
side-effects
. No doubt
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
Did you mean “to have”?
too have
their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
later on if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
fails, we can save their
Did you mean “lives”?
life
. It has happened in the past that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
certain
medicines have responded well on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they haven't responded well on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
. Even
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
certain
Covid-19 vaccines responded well on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they were not as successful on the humans.

Hence
, I believe that it is not at all cruel to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carry
out the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
medicines on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
230 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state