In recent times, the issue of whether a stable penalty applying or not for each type of offense has become highly controversial. Some say that punishment should be fixed for each type of crime, however, others believe that it should not. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons that the judgment should set. Perhaps the main reason why people favor this idea is because of avoiding complexity. A good illustration of this is that in the current time any judgment of crime has taken a long time because of the delay of the trial process. For instance, the maximum time it has been seen that the victim could not find justice immediately. A further point in favor of fixed punishment is that it can prevent crime by using the quick trial, which is a warning for the culprit or who has an intention to commit a crime.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that punishment should differ on a person's crime. The main reason why people think that this is a good idea is because of implementing a fair trial. If the punishment, for example, is not taken into consideration then the trial would not be appropriate and criminals may find a large penalty for committing less offense, in the same way, less penalty for committing a large fault.
In conclusion, whether punishment should be fixed or not is a topic that is very relevant to modern society. Despite arguments to the contrary, I very strongly feel that the punishment should not be fixed. If the penalty considers an individual's crime that will be better for human society.
In recent
times
, the issue of whether a stable
penalty
applying or not for each type of offense has become
highly
controversial.
Some
say that
punishment
should be
fixed
for each type of
crime
,
however
, others believe that it should not. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my
overall
opinion.
Generally
speaking, there are two main reasons that the judgment should set. Perhaps the main reason why
people
favor this
idea
is
because
of avoiding complexity. A
good
illustration of this is that in the
current
time
any judgment of
crime
has taken a long
time
because
of the delay of the
trial
process.
For instance
, the maximum
time
it has been
seen
that the victim could not find justice immediately. A
further
point in favor of
fixed
punishment
is that it can
prevent
crime
by using the quick
trial
, which is a warning for the culprit or who has an intention to commit a crime.
Despite these arguments, there is
also
a case for the
idea
that
punishment
should differ on a person's
crime
. The main reason why
people
think
that this is a
good
idea
is
because
of implementing a
fair
trial
. If the
punishment
,
for example
, is not taken into consideration then the
trial
would not be appropriate and criminals may find a large
penalty
for committing less offense,
in the same way
, less
penalty
for committing a large fault.
In conclusion
, whether
punishment
should be
fixed
or not is a topic
that is
very
relevant to modern society. Despite arguments to the contrary, I
very
strongly
feel that the
punishment
should not be
fixed
. If the
penalty
considers an individual's
crime
that will be better for human society.