It is argued by some people that punishments should be fixed for all times of crimes. Other people believe that situation of crimes and reasons behind undergoing such activities should be considered before giving punishment. In my opinion, all criminals should be punished as no reason can justify a crime.
People who believe in fixed punishments argue that individuals committing a crime should very well be aware of the consequences of their crime. No amount of explanation can justify a crime. In other words, if people are forgiven by law, by considering their reasons and logics, the incidence of these unlawful acts is likely to increase. It will become a trend amongst the people to commit an illegal act and later on justifying it with logics. The only way to curb this tendency would be to give fixed punishments whatever the reason the accused may give.
On the other hand, some people believe that while giving verdicts or punishments for an unlawful act, the background and motive of the individual should be taken into account. According to them everyone is not a criminal and strict punishment by law will force these people to retaliate against the state. The organised gangs are in fact looking for such anti state agents who have sentiments against the and use them for their purposes. For instance, if a person steals food because he was starving do not deserve to be penalised the same way as a person who robs a bank. Hence, the judiciary and law needs to strike a balance while giving a verdict.
In conclusion, a country or even a company is managed on the basis of reward and punishment. Reward for positive actions and punishment for unlawful activities. So whatever the circumstances behind the crime, people mend their ways only if scared of punishment otherwise it will be very difficult to manage.
It
is argued
by
some
people
that
punishments
should be
fixed
for all times of
crimes
. Other
people
believe that situation of
crimes
and
reasons
behind undergoing such activities should
be considered
before
giving
punishment
. In my opinion, all criminals should
be punished
as no
reason
can justify a crime.
People
who believe in
fixed
punishments
argue that individuals committing a
crime
should
very
well be aware of the consequences of their
crime
. No amount of explanation can justify a
crime
.
In other words
, if
people
are forgiven
by law, by considering their
reasons
and logics, the incidence of these unlawful acts is likely to increase. It will become a trend amongst the
people
to commit an illegal act and later on justifying it with logics. The
only
way to curb this tendency would be to give
fixed
punishments
whatever the
reason
the accused may give.
On the other hand
,
some
people
believe that while giving verdicts or
punishments
for an unlawful act, the background and motive of the individual should
be taken
into account. According to them everyone is not a criminal and strict
punishment
by law will force these
people
to retaliate against the state. The
organised
gangs are in fact looking for such
anti state
agents who have sentiments against the and
use
them for their purposes.
For instance
, if a person steals food
because
he was starving do not deserve to be
penalised
the same way as a person who robs a bank.
Hence
, the judiciary and law needs to strike a balance while giving a verdict.
In conclusion
, a country or even a
company
is managed
on the basis of reward and
punishment
. Reward for
positive
actions and
punishment
for unlawful activities.
So
whatever the circumstances behind the
crime
,
people
mend their ways
only
if scared of
punishment
otherwise
it will be
very
difficult to manage.