These days, some persons believe that the government should not spend too many resources on the arts, perhaps the money spent on something else. Frankly, I agree with one part of this opinion.
Firstly, arts do help people in their lives. The government wants to teach people history through the arts (movies; paintings; sculptures, etc. ) In consequence, we can learn a part of our history. For instance, the statue Venus in Louvre Museum shows a sign of the Antique period. It would attract lots of tourists around the world. Hence, arts are the national treasure of the country. That explains the reason why the government pays a sum to find the fortunes. Secondly, the government uses art as a way of communicating with the citizens. Posters, caricatures, films often have a deep meaning. They are used to emphasize people's bad habits, friendship, etc. We can mention the movie "Invictus" which describes the desire to unify two races in one country. Therefore, segregation is banned.
On the other hand, the government indeed tends to use much money on arts. The property aims to aid poor people. In some developed countries (France, the UK, etc. ), journalists report that money often wastes on art. I believe that they should use finances to help suffering children in Haiti, South Africa, etc. . . Moreover, fine art is considered a form of leisure, thus an extra-activity. Consequently, the authority should focus on the reality (economic, social, environment) instead of artworks. People care about politics, sciences because it affects more in their lives.
Although art is useful in society, I admit that the executive should keep in mind that art is only a fiction form to improve human lifestyles. There are more things to look up in the world.
These days,
some
persons believe that the
government
should not spend too
many
resources on the
arts
, perhaps the money spent on something else.
Frankly
, I
agree
with one part of this opinion.
Firstly
,
arts
do
help
people
in their
lives
. The
government
wants to teach
people
history through the
arts
(movies; paintings; sculptures, etc.
)
In consequence, we can learn a part of our history.
For instance
, the statue Venus in Louvre Museum
shows
a
sign
of the Antique period. It would attract lots of tourists around the world.
Hence
,
arts
are the national treasure of the country. That
explains
the reason why the
government
pays a sum to find the fortunes.
Secondly
, the
government
uses
art
as a way of communicating with the citizens. Posters, caricatures, films
often
have a deep meaning. They are
used to emphasize
people
's
bad
habits, friendship, etc. We can mention the movie
"
Invictus
"
which
describes
the desire to unify two races in one country.
Therefore
, segregation
is banned
.
On the other hand
, the
government
indeed
tends to
use
much money on
arts
. The property aims to aid poor
people
. In
some
developed countries
(France, the UK, etc.
)
, journalists report that money
often
wastes on
art
. I believe that they should
use
finances to
help
suffering
children in Haiti, South Africa, etc.
.
.
Moreover
, fine
art
is considered
a form of leisure,
thus
an extra-activity.
Consequently
, the authority should focus on the reality (economic, social, environment)
instead
of artworks.
People
care about politics, sciences
because
it affects more in their
lives
.
Although
art
is useful in society, I admit that the executive should
keep
in mind that
art
is
only
a fiction form to
improve
human lifestyles. There are more things to look up in the world.