Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Re8Q

Restricting information for some vague security reasons is not democratic or rational according to some while others express that information should be available only when the necessity arrives. Both views have some justification, and I firmly believe that scientific studies, universities, research institutions and businesses can benefit the whole nation if all information is made accessible to them. To begin with, sensitive information, that could be used to breach security, manipulate the stock market, create a market monopoly or trade with terrorists, should be scrutinized before making them publicly accessible. In this digital era, information spread like wildfire and for the sake of maintaining global peace, they should be delimited, according to many. For instance, if nuclear technology is shared with all nations for scientific studies, the world will soon stand on the verge of obliteration, despite an inconceivable possibility this technology possesses to facilitate all nations. On the contrary, scientific research largely depends on available data and previous discoveries. If valuable information and past findings are not shared openly with academics and researchers, global progress will become standstill. For instance, the Internet is probably the most significant invention the modern world has seen and if this technology had not been shared by the US military, we would still be living in the pre-internet era. Moreover, restricted information has no value if they are not used to solve any real-world problem and thus curbing them is like imprisoning human potential. Finally, world history suggests that humankind has advanced due to discoveries and inventions shared with the world as each finding went through profound modification and advancement. I thus personally favour the ideology that supports 'free information for all'. In conclusion, information has limited value when it is restrained and not shared. For the true global progress, restriction on valuable information should be debarred and let people know the truth instead of keeping them in darkness.

Restricting You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 vague security reasons is not democratic or rational according to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 while others express that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 should be available This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 when the necessity arrives. Both views have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 justification, and I firmly
 believe that scientific studies, universities, research institutions and businesses can benefit the whole nation if all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
is made
 accessible to them.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, sensitive You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
, that could be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to breach security, manipulate the stock market, create a market monopoly or trade with terrorists, should be scrutinized
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 making them publicly
 accessible. In this digital era, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 spread like wildfire and for the sake of maintaining global peace, they should be delimited
, according to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
. For instance
, if nuclear technology is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommunalcommonmutual
shared
 with all nations for scientific studies, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 will This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:in the near future
soon
 stand on the verge of obliteration, despite an inconceivable possibility this technology possesses to facilitate all nations.

On the contrary
, scientific research largely
 depends on available data and previous discoveries. If valuable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 and past findings are not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommunalcommonmutual
shared
openly
 with academics and researchers, global progress will become standstill. For instance
, the Internet is probably
 the most significant invention the modern You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 has This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 and if this technology had not been You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommunalcommonmutual
shared
 by the US military, we would still
 be living in the Possible spelling mistake found.
pre-internet
 era. Moreover
, restricted You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 has no value if they are not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to solve any real-world problem and thus
 curbing them is like imprisoning human potential. Finally
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 history suggests that humankind has advanced due to discoveries and inventions You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommunalcommonmutual
shared
 with the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 as each finding went through profound modification and advancement. I thus
personally
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 the ideology that supports 'free You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 for all'.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 has limited value when it is restrained
 and not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommunalcommonmutual
shared
. For the true global progress, restriction on valuable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinstructionwordknowledgeintelligenceadvicematerial
information
 should be debarred
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 know the truth instead
 of keeping them in darkness. 