Many people think that death penalty is an effective tool to prevent violent crime. On the contrary, there are some drawbacks of the capital punishment. I believe that without death penalty we are more vulnerable to crimes, so it is acceptible thing in our society.
To begin with, not even all sentences are fair, while the consequences of capital punishment are irreversible. The possibility of realizing of death penalty on the innocent person are always exist. It is rather obvious that such a possibility is increased in a country full of corruption and authority indifference. Moreover, do people have any rights to kill other people? Every human has basic rights and everyone without exception has a right to live. And no one is allowed to infringe this right, irrespective of the person 's deed.
On the contrary, there are plenty of humans who were committed unbelievably in their cruelty murders. It will be simply dangerous for society if they are still alive. For instance, Ted Bandy killed a plenty of women and at the end of his life he received a capital punishment by means of electric chair. Perhaps his death saved a lot of lives, because when he was caught a few years before his death, the police let him go due to the lack of his guilty proof. Consequently, a batch of his new murders were committed by him. These murders could be avoided if the police found the possibility to prosecute the murderer. In addition, when murderers are able to afford themself to kill innocent people, the death penalty restore equilibrium of justice.
In conclusion, taking into account briefly discussed arguments, I would like to reaffirm my position that despite on some drawbacks, death penalty provedes an opportunity to control crimes and to prevent other people for doing crimes.
Many
people
think
that death
penalty
is an effective tool to
prevent
violent
crime
.
On the contrary
, there are
some
drawbacks of the capital punishment. I believe that without death
penalty
we are more vulnerable to
crimes
,
so
it is
acceptible
thing in our society.
To
begin
with, not even all sentences are
fair
, while the consequences of capital punishment are irreversible. The possibility of realizing of death
penalty
on the innocent person are always
exist
. It is
rather
obvious that such a possibility
is increased
in a country full of corruption and authority indifference.
Moreover
, do
people
have any
rights
to kill other
people
? Every human has basic
rights
and everyone without exception has a
right
to
live
. And no one is
allowed
to infringe this
right
, irrespective of the person 's deed.
On the contrary
, there are
plenty
of humans who
were committed
unbelievably
in their cruelty murders. It will be
simply
dangerous
for society if they are
still
alive.
For instance
, Ted Bandy killed a
plenty
of women and at the
end
of his life he received a capital punishment by means of electric chair. Perhaps his death saved
a lot of
lives
,
because
when he
was caught
a few years
before
his death, the police
let
him go due to the lack of his guilty proof.
Consequently
, a batch of his new murders
were committed
by him. These murders could
be avoided
if the police found the possibility to prosecute the murderer.
In addition
, when murderers are able to afford
themself
to kill innocent
people
, the death
penalty
restore equilibrium of justice.
In conclusion
, taking into account
briefly
discussed arguments, I would like to reaffirm my position that despite on
some
drawbacks, death
penalty
provedes
an opportunity to control
crimes
and to
prevent
other
people
for doing
crimes
.