In this day and age, in some countries, free and public healthcare system services are introduced by the government in order to adapt to the urgent needs of citizens, while in other parts of the world, many people mainly rely on private healthcare provision. In this essay, I am going to argue that the noticeable merits of public healthcare service outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, public healthcare could also have various downsides. First and foremost, free medical services often lack the quality and have fewer doctors, nurses and medical instruments. This makes the diagnosis of a disease harder and people often get poor services from such a free camp. They have to wait for a long time and this is detrimental for patients who need emergency medical attention. Furthermore, corruption often drains a large amount of money and adds burden to the government. However, these can all be controlled if proper measures are taken. In fact, the drawbacks of free public medical service are not a good excuse to support it.
On the other hand, the benefits of government-provided healthcare system far more significant than the shortcomings. To commence with, the private healthcare system may be costly making the underprivileged unable to afford the expensive fee, while, some people who rely on free healthcare can gain easier access to the basic service essential for living standards. Precisely, government provision of healthcare is valued by poorer people, which prevents the elderly worrying about the affordability of treatments. As an illustration, some studies have shown that thanks to the affordable medical fee, the proportion of people who suffer from illnesses decreased significantly in the last decade.
In conclusion, although I recognize the downsides of the public healthcare system, I would contend that the benefits are much more significant.
In this day and age, in
some
countries,
free
and
public
healthcare
system
services
are introduced
by the
government
in order to adapt to the urgent needs of citizens, while in other parts of the world,
many
people
mainly
rely on private healthcare provision. In this essay, I am going to argue that the noticeable merits of
public
healthcare
service
outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand,
public
healthcare could
also
have various downsides.
First
and foremost,
free
medical
services
often
lack the quality and have fewer doctors, nurses and
medical
instruments. This
makes
the diagnosis of a disease harder and
people
often
get
poor
services
from such a
free
camp. They
have to
wait for a long time and this is detrimental for patients who need emergency
medical
attention.
Furthermore
, corruption
often
drains a large amount of money and
adds
burden to the
government
.
However
,
these can
all
be controlled
if proper measures
are taken
. In fact, the drawbacks of
free
public
medical
service
are not a
good
excuse to support it.
On the other hand
, the benefits of
government
-provided healthcare
system
far more significant than the shortcomings. To commence with, the private healthcare
system
may be costly making the underprivileged unable to afford the expensive fee, while,
some
people
who rely on
free
healthcare can gain easier access to the basic
service
essential for living standards.
Precisely
,
government
provision of healthcare
is valued
by poorer
people
, which
prevents
the elderly worrying about the affordability of treatments. As an illustration,
some
studies have shown that thanks to the affordable
medical
fee, the proportion of
people
who suffer from illnesses decreased
significantly
in the last decade.
In conclusion
, although I recognize the downsides of the
public
healthcare
system
, I would contend that the benefits are much more significant.