Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some argue that we should use cleaner energy sources to protect the environment, even though they are more expensive than traditional energy sources like coal and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that we should use cleaner energy sources to protect the environment, even though they are more expensive than traditional energy sources like coal and oil. 0Ayg9

While most countries around the world nowadays chose coal and oil as main sources of energy, some people claimed that we should use green energy in order to alleviate the environmental problems. The following paragraphs will explain why I strongly support the suggestion to draw upon cleaner energy. First and foremost, as human beings, it is our responsibility to protect the natural world by any possible means including give up some conventional ways of obtaining energy. Since all sorts of current human activities take place on Earth, undoubtfully, the abuse of fossil fuel has become the culprit of series of environmental issues. For example, when fossil fuels are burnt in a car engine, a large amount of CO2, along with other greenhouse gases---especially these are not biodegradable---is eliminated into the atmosphere, which is responsible for some severe environmental issues such as air pollution and global warming. Noticing such harsh weather are proofed to have a long-lasting impact. Therefore, in order to build a cleaner world, we must replace such harmful fuels. On the other hand, consider the monetary matters, the opponent of the above statement says that instead of exploiting an alternative source of energy, it is better to spend money elsewhere such as growing trees, or develop sewage treatment which is proofed to be helpful in terms of cleaning. Nevertheless, the problem won’t be solved yet, unless we remove the sources of pollution. Consequently, people still have to spend extra fortunes on handling such contamination. What’s more, such things are out of concern if we simply use cleaner energy, namely, they produce no pollutants in the aftermath. In a word, rather than find ways to deal with the pollutants after burning fossil fuels, people should pay more attention to thoroughly eliminate the source of pollution. To conclude, I take a side on the suggestion that people should try alternative sources of energy not merely because of the importance of the natural world to humans but also a long-term approach to eliminate pollution.

While most countries around the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 nowadays chose coal and oil as main You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 claimed that we should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 green You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 in order to alleviate the environmental problems. The following paragraphs will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interpret
explain
 why I strongly
 support the suggestion to draw upon cleaner energy.

First
 and foremost, as human beings, it is our responsibility to protect the natural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 by any possible means including give up This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 conventional ways of obtaining You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. Since all sorts of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
 human activities take place on Earth, Possible spelling mistake found.doubtfully
undoubtfully
, the abuse of fossil fuel has become the culprit of series of environmental issues. For example
, when fossil fuels are burnt
 in a car engine, a large amount of CO2, along with other greenhouse gases---especially
 these are not biodegradable---is eliminated
 into the atmosphere, which is responsible for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 severe environmental issues such as air pollution and global warming. Noticing such harsh weather are proofed
 to have a long-lasting impact. Therefore
, in order to build a cleaner You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
, we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 replace such harmful fuels.

On the other hand
, consider the monetary matters, the opponent of the above statement says that instead
 of exploiting an alternative You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, it is better to spend money elsewhere such as growing trees, or develop sewage treatment which is proofed
 to be helpful in terms of cleaning. Nevertheless
, the problem won’t be solved
yet
, unless we remove the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 of pollution. Consequently
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 spend extra fortunes on handling such contamination. What’s more, such things are out of concern if we simply
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 cleaner You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, namely
, they produce no pollutants in the aftermath. In a word, rather
 than find ways to deal with the pollutants after burning fossil fuels, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should pay more attention to thoroughly
 eliminate the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 of pollution.

To conclude
, I take a side on the suggestion that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should try alternative You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 not merely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the importance of the natural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 to humans This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 a long-term approach to eliminate pollution. 