In the following argument, it is stated that the Pleasantville High School should urge the students to fulfill 40 hours of community service prior to their graduation. The author has come to this conclusion based on the undue assumption that if students engaged in community service, their assistance in local charities would be increased and would be helpful for the future of the student. However, before the author’s contention can be properly evaluated, three assumptions must be examined.
at the first, the author prematurely presumes that institute a program that forces the student to pass 40 hours in community service will encourage them to assist more with charities. It is possible that this obligation has a reverse effect on the student and subsequently not only don’t provide any helpful measure in order to fulfill the charities needs but also make a lot of problem for these organization and take significant energy and time from them to resolve the disorders. If the scenario has merit, the drawn conclusion in the original argument is significantly weakened.
Secondly, the argument claims, without justification, that teachers, parents and other community member agree with a importance of teaching student about the value of community services. This statement is clearly vague because the author didn’t mention anything about the what types of the community service consider as a importance. Perhaps, different parents and teachers have various ideas about this topic, some of them may think that their children are better to work with a charity that engaged in the healthcare but there is not any kind of this charity in the Pleasantville, so the importance of engaging in community services may decrease in their mind. Because of these probabilities and lake of the definite explanation the author conclusion will impugn remarkably.
Finally, the argument without warrant assumes that this program helps the student to understand the importance of giving back to their community. It is conceivable that 40 hours is very insufficient for that purpose because there isn’t any authentic research that referred to it. there is a probability that If you dedicate an improper amount of time to something, most of the time you will get a reverse result. Therefore, if the above is true, the author conclusion doesn’t hold water.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is flawed due to its reliance on unwarranted assumptions. If the author able to correct the aforementioned assumption and provide more information, it will be possible that increase and improve the viability of his deduction and program.
In the following
argument
, it
is stated
that the
Pleasantville
High School should urge the
students
to fulfill 40 hours of
community
service
prior to their graduation. The
author
has
come
to this
conclusion
based on the undue
assumption
that if
students
engaged in
community
service
, their assistance in local
charities
would
be increased
and would be helpful for the future of the
student
.
However
,
before
the
author’s
contention can be
properly
evaluated, three
assumptions
must
be examined
.
at
the
first
, the
author
prematurely
presumes that institute a program that forces the
student
to pass 40 hours in
community
service
will encourage them to assist more with
charities
. It is possible that this obligation has a reverse effect on the
student
and
subsequently
not
only
don’t provide any helpful measure in order to fulfill the
charities
needs
but
also
make
a lot of problem
for
these organization
and take significant energy and time from them to resolve the disorders. If the scenario has merit, the drawn
conclusion
in the original
argument
is
significantly
weakened.
Secondly
, the
argument
claims, without justification, that teachers, parents and other
community
member
agree
with
a
importance
of teaching
student
about the value of
community
services
. This statement is
clearly
vague
because
the
author
didn’t mention anything about the what types of the
community
service
consider as
a
importance
. Perhaps,
different
parents and teachers have various
ideas
about this topic,
some
of them may
think
that their children are better to work with a
charity
that engaged in the healthcare
but
there is not any kind of this
charity
in the
Pleasantville
,
so
the
importance
of engaging in
community
services
may decrease in their mind.
Because
of these probabilities and lake of the
definite
explanation the
author
conclusion
will impugn
remarkably
.
Finally
, the
argument
without warrant assumes that this program
helps
the
student
to understand the
importance
of giving back to their
community
. It is conceivable that 40 hours is
very
insufficient for that purpose
because
there isn’t any authentic research that referred to it. there is a probability that If you dedicate an improper amount of time to something, most of the time you will
get
a reverse result.
Therefore
, if the above is true, the
author
conclusion
doesn’t hold water.
In
conclusion
, the
argument
, as it stands
now
,
is flawed
due to its reliance on unwarranted
assumptions
. If the
author
able to correct the aforementioned
assumption
and provide more information, it will be possible that increase and
improve
the viability of his deduction and program.