Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

sdfhghjkb dcfghbjnklm gbhnjk;l

sdfhghjkb dcfghbjnklm gbhnjk;l 7rBY6

The reading and the lecture are both about genetically modified trees. The author provides three theories about why genetically modified trees are beneficial. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the reading. Firstly, The lecturer mentions that in the case of natural trees, we can observe variations among a particular kind of species. Hence, if one kind of a species becomes destroyed, other kinds may survive. Therefore, existence of that species is not endangered. On the other hand, in genetically modified trees, all trees under a particular species are same in genetic structure. As a result, if one tree of a particular species is killed due to factor like virus, bacteria, weather etc, , then whole species is likely to be killed. This contradicts what the lecturer indicates. Secondly, in the lecture, it is said that genetically modified trees are economically friendly. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He mentions that seeds of economically modified trees are costly. Additionally, he points out that when they get new seeds from the existing tree, they have to give money for that trees to the seed company from where they bought seeds previously. Lastly, according to the reading, genetically modified trees save the jungle and wildlife. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is genetically modified trees grow up aggresively and consume more natural resources like foods, chemicals available in the soil. Hence, natural trees in the jungle do not get proper food to grow up and become endangered.

The reading and the lecture are both about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
. The author provides three theories about why You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 are beneficial. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 disputes the claims made in the reading.

Firstly
, The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 mentions that in the case of natural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
, we can observe variations among a particular kind of species. Hence
, if one If 'kind' is a classification term, 'a' is not necessary. Use "kind of". (The phrases 'kind of' and 'sort of' are informal if they mean 'to some extent'.)kind of
kind of a
 species becomes This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishedruined
destroyed
, other kinds may survive. Therefore
, existence of that species is not endangered. On the other hand
, in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
, all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 under a particular species are same in genetic structure. As a result
, if one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
tree
 of a particular species is killed
 due to factor like virus, bacteria, weather etc,Two consecutive commas,
 ,
 then whole species is likely to be killed
. This contradicts what the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 indicates.

Secondly
, in the lecture, it is said
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 are economically
 friendly. The specific argument is challenged
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
. He mentions that seeds of economically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 are costly. Additionally
, he points out that when they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 new seeds

from the existing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
tree
, they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 give money for that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 to the seed This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 from where they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchased
bought
 seeds previously.

Lastly
, according to the reading, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 save the jungle and wildlife. In contrast
, the lecturer's stance is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturallyintrinsicallyconstitutionally
genetically
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaltered
modified
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 grow up Possible spelling mistake found.aggressively
aggresively
 and consume more natural resources like foods, chemicals available in the soil. Hence
, natural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsaplingshrubwoodforesttimberseedling
trees
 in the jungle do not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 proper food to grow up and become endangered. 