Scholars should bear the cost of their own tertiary education rather than having free education utilizing the state funds . I disagree with this statement and my views will be discuss in the upcoming paragraphs .
Scholars should bear the cost of their own tertiary education rather than having free education utilizing the state funds. I disagree with this statement and my views will be discuss in the upcoming paragraphs. GJ6yg
To begin with, if the students pay the full cost of their own University studies there are other expenses. To explain it, with the study expense such as accomodation, hostel, community, examinations and books stationary expenses are here. These expenses will be pay by scholars. To examlify, students tution fees is very high and always children take tution classes for their higher education. As a result, students can not concentrate their studies because these expenditure became burden on students. Further, every student is not from affluent back ground, some students from poor families. That is why, which scholars belong to poor families they can not pay childrens University fee. As a result, discrimination promotes between rich and poor. Because poor scholars feel very bad when their families can not afford to students for studies. Moreover, when state provide free education to students, it is a very beneficial for government because with the higher education tax revenues, economy productivity will be increased. By good education, greater workforce are plus points because which students have good skills about education they do hard work on their work. Which generates more funds for higher economy. When students earn more money they always pay their funds with higher money. Furthermore, these factors are pivotal for development for any nation. In conclusion, government should provide free education to poor students because poor scholars can not pay other expenses which related their studies such as tution fee, hostel rent and exam fee.
To
begin
with, if the
students
pay
the full cost of their
own
University
studies
there are other expenses. To
explain
it, with the
study
expense
such as
accomodation
, hostel, community, examinations and books stationary expenses are here. These expenses will be
pay
by
scholars
. To
examlify
,
students
tution
fees
is
very
high and always children take
tution
classes for their higher
education
.
As a result
,
students
can not concentrate their
studies
because
these expenditure
became burden on
students
.
Further
, every
student
is not from affluent back ground,
some
students
from
poor
families.
That is
why, which
scholars
belong to
poor
families they can not
pay
childrens
University
fee
.
As a result
, discrimination promotes between rich and
poor
.
Because
poor
scholars
feel
very
bad
when their families can not afford to
students
for
studies
.
Moreover
, when state provide free
education
to
students
, it is a
very
beneficial for
government
because
with the higher
education
tax revenues, economy productivity will
be increased
. By
good
education
, greater workforce are plus points
because
which
students
have
good
skills
about
education
they do
hard
work on their work. Which generates more funds for higher economy.
When
students
earn more money they always
pay
their funds with higher money.
Furthermore
, these factors are pivotal for development for any nation.
In conclusion
,
government
should provide free
education
to
poor
students
because
poor
scholars
can not
pay
other expenses which related their
studies
such as
tution
fee
, hostel rent and exam
fee
.