The latest trend in psychological studies has revealed that a person’s characteristics are highly likely to be predetermined by their genes. However, some advocate that a person’s personality and development is more shaped by life experiences rather than heredity. I firmly believe the latter.
First, life experience plays a more essential role in forming a person’s traits than genes. In other words, each individual distinguishes himself from others more due to after-birth experiences which vary from person to person. For instance, a person who has travelled to a range of countries tends to be more inclusive and open-mined than those without any overseas experiences. Therefore, it is the life experiences rather than genes that decide who we are.
Further to this point, a great many personal traits which contribute to further development can only be acquired via learning through trial and error in real life. One such example is diligence. The characteristic of being fully committed is unarguably cultivated by showing persistence and commitment when confronting countless problems in life. However, no scientific proof has been foundto suggest that diligence is a trait which is programmed into the genes.
Last but not least, a personal characteristic is more likely to be influenced by external environment. Undeniably, a child who grows up in a well-educated family is more likely to possess qualities such as integrity and honesty than that from a drug-abusive one. Conversely, a child exposed to gangs and criminal activity has a greater tendency to resort to violence or even get involved in illegal trafficking later on than that from a well-disciplined environment. Therefore, it is self-evident that external influence has a significant impact on moulding a person’s character.
To sum up, I strongly believe a person’s character and development is mainly determined by life experience instead of genetic inheritance based on the above mentioned arguments
The latest trend in psychological studies has revealed that a
person’s
characteristics are
highly
likely to
be predetermined
by their genes.
However
,
some
advocate that a
person’s
personality and development is more shaped by
life
experiences
rather
than heredity. I
firmly
believe the latter.
First
,
life
experience
plays a more essential role in forming a
person’s
traits than genes.
In other words
, each individual distinguishes himself from others more due to after-birth
experiences
which vary from
person
to
person
.
For instance
, a
person
who has travelled to a range of countries tends to be more inclusive and open-mined than those without any overseas
experiences
.
Therefore
, it is the
life
experiences
rather
than genes that decide who we are.
Further
to this point, a great
many
personal traits which contribute to
further
development can
only
be acquired
via learning through trial and error in real
life
. One such example is diligence. The characteristic of being
fully
committed is
unarguably
cultivated by showing persistence and commitment when confronting countless problems in
life
.
However
, no scientific proof has been
foundto
suggest that diligence is a trait which
is programmed
into the genes.
Last
but
not least, a personal characteristic is more likely to
be influenced
by external environment.
Undeniably
, a child who grows up in a well-educated family is more likely to possess qualities such as integrity and honesty than that from a drug-abusive one.
Conversely
, a child exposed to gangs and criminal activity has a greater tendency to resort to violence or even
get
involved in illegal trafficking later on than that from a well-disciplined environment.
Therefore
, it is self-evident that external influence has a significant impact on
moulding
a
person’s
character.
To sum up, I
strongly
believe a
person’s
character and development is
mainly
determined by
life
experience
instead
of genetic inheritance based on the above mentioned arguments