The article states that the privatized spaceflight industry will bring great benefits for both science and the public, and provides three reasons for that. But the professor is not in the same idea and avers that privat industry of spaceflight will have no advantages neither for science nor for public and opposes each reasons of the author.
First, the passage claims that privat space travel will make the expences of space exploration cheaper than now. However the professor refutes this point by stating that, having a privat space travel need to a complicated space traffic controlers, which makes cast and also because of the importance of safty of travelers, creators need to several steps of testing of their equipments and it is expensive too.
Secondly, the author concerned that privat companies will help to acceleration of scientific researches. On the other hand the lecturer thinks that it is not a sound idea and in fact it will prevent from more scientific discoveries, she explains that because of the high income in privt companis the reaserchers will work there and consequently due to the business goals of the privat companies the researchers are not motivated to work on research projects as well as in government companies.
Finally, the paper claims that privatized industry will save people's tax and public will be beneficiary. In the contrary the lecturer mentions that because of the huge expenses of building space stations or space airports even with taking money from customers the privat companies will need to public tax to complate their operations and finally people have to pay more tax.
The article states that the privatized spaceflight industry will bring great benefits for both science and the
public
, and provides three reasons for that.
But
the professor is not in the same
idea
and avers that
privat
industry of spaceflight will have no advantages neither for science nor for
public
and opposes each reasons of the author.
First
, the passage claims that
privat
space
travel will
make
the
expences
of
space
exploration cheaper than
now
.
However
the professor refutes this point by stating that, having a
privat
space
travel need to a complicated
space
traffic
controlers
, which
makes
cast and
also
because
of the importance of
safty
of travelers, creators need to several steps of testing of their equipments and it is expensive too.
Secondly
, the author concerned that
privat
companies
will
help
to acceleration of scientific researches.
On the other hand
the lecturer
thinks
that it is not a sound
idea
and in fact it will
prevent
from more scientific discoveries, she
explains
that
because
of the high income in
privt
companis
the
reaserchers
will work there and
consequently
due to the business goals of the
privat
companies
the researchers are not motivated to work on research projects
as well
as in
government
companies
.
Finally
, the paper claims that privatized industry will save
people
's tax and
public
will be beneficiary. In the contrary the lecturer mentions that
because
of the huge expenses of building
space
stations or
space
airports even with taking money from customers the
privat
companies
will need to
public
tax to
complate
their operations and
finally
people
have to
pay more tax.