The reading and lecture are both about the wildlife crossing. The author of the reading is of the opinion that wildlife crossings are not useful for animals for several reasons. ; however, the lecturer rebuts the claim of the author. He believes that wildlife crossings are very useful for animals. The lecturer cast the doubt on the main point by providing three reasons.
First of all, the author argues that animals can not train themselves to use the crossings as humans do; furthermore, he mentions that research suggests that animal animals living in the wild are often reluctant to cross these crossings to mingle with other populations; howbeit, this argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that animals will adapt themselves with the passage of time and learns to use the wildlife crossings.
Besides, the reading states that wildlife crossings become a waste of financial resources as such crossings require lot of money to build; nonetheless, the lecturer refutes the claim of the author by mentioning that wildlife structures benefit both animals and humans. He further states that trough these structures we can minimize the accidents occurred on the roads.
Finally, the author posits that the wildlife crossings are damaged and prevent wild animals from reproducing; nevertheless, the lecturer refutes the statement of the author. He believes that wildlife crossings help the wild animals for reproducing; moreover, he states that such crossings reconnect the two ways of forests and lead easily for wild animals to meet their mates. ; therefore, wildlife crossings benefits wild animals in the long run.
The reading and lecture are both about the
wildlife
crossing
. The
author
of the reading is of the opinion that
wildlife
crossings
are not useful for
animals
for several reasons.
;
however
, the
lecturer
rebuts the claim of the
author
. He believes that
wildlife
crossings
are
very
useful for
animals
. The
lecturer
cast the doubt on the main point by providing three reasons.
First of all
, the
author
argues that
animals
can not train themselves to
use
the
crossings
as humans do;
furthermore
, he mentions that research suggests that
animal
animals
living in the wild are
often
reluctant to cross these
crossings
to mingle with other populations; howbeit, this argument
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. He claims that
animals
will adapt themselves with the passage of time and learns to
use
the
wildlife
crossings.
Besides
, the reading states that
wildlife
crossings
become a waste of financial resources as such
crossings
require lot of money to build; nonetheless, the
lecturer
refutes the claim of the
author
by mentioning that
wildlife
structures benefit both
animals
and humans. He
further
states that trough these structures we can minimize the accidents occurred on the roads.
Finally
, the
author
posits that the
wildlife
crossings
are damaged
and
prevent
wild
animals
from reproducing;
nevertheless
, the
lecturer
refutes the statement of the
author
. He believes that
wildlife
crossings
help
the wild
animals
for reproducing;
moreover
, he states that such
crossings
reconnect the two ways of forests and lead
easily
for wild
animals
to
meet
their mates.
;
therefore
,
wildlife
crossings
benefits wild
animals
in the long run.