Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

railways vs public transport

railways vs public transport Kllk9
Railways as a means of transport plays an indispensable and imperative role in the operations and development of an economy. A group of people consider that government should invest in high-speed train links and networks, however, others are in the favour of enhancing the current public transport system. In my perspective, spending the state's funds on upgrading the existing conditions of public transport is significantly more essential than spending it on construction of very fast trains. Certainly, new revitalised bullet trains tracks would be beneficial both for the general public and economy. If high speed trains be given preference the issue of traffic congestion would be curbed to a great extent as people will discontinue to commute in their own private vehicles. Not only this, it will aid people to save their time which they commonly lose in traffic gridlocks and boosts the productivity. For instance, traffic jams cost US economy 87 Billion USD in 2018 and it is estimated that construction of such locomotives will minimise this loss. Hence, creating high speed rail tracks are necessary for the reasons aforementioned. On the other hand, Government, especially in developing nations, should lay more emphasis on improving the existing public transport infrastructure because of its wider coverage, affordability and inadequacy and terrible condition. Not only do the mass transit systems like railways, buses are used by larger section of people in the world but also offers mode of transit both for passengers and freight which in turn makes it a lifeline of transport system of any country. Horrific state such filthy premises, poor hygienic conditions of stations or depots of present public mode of transit (mainly in developing or third world nations) makes it inarguably essential for the governing bodies to prioritize funding in this sector. In my judgement, benefits of having bullet trains distinctively and certainly cannot outweigh the extensive advantages of upgrading the present system of mass transit because of the scope it offers, being pocket friendly and trickle-down benefits to financially weaker sections of the country. Higher authorities, therefore, should allocate resources in this direction then spending it on fast trains.
Railways as a means of transport plays an indispensable and imperative role in the operations and

development of an economy. A group of
people
consider that
government
should invest in high-speed

train links and networks,
however
, others are in the
favour
of enhancing the
current
public
transport

system. In my perspective, spending the state's funds on upgrading the existing conditions of public

transport is
significantly
more essential than spending it on construction of
very
fast
trains.

Certainly
, new
revitalised
bullet
trains
tracks
would be beneficial both for the general
public
and

economy. If high speed
trains
be
given
preference the issue of traffic congestion would
be curbed
to

a great extent as
people
will discontinue to commute in their
own
private vehicles. Not
only
this, it

will aid
people
to save their time which they
commonly
lose in traffic gridlocks and boosts the

productivity.
For instance
, traffic jams cost US economy 87 Billion USD in 2018 and it
is estimated
that

construction of such locomotives will
minimise
this loss.
Hence
, creating high speed rail
tracks
are

necessary for the reasons aforementioned.

On the other hand
,
Government
,
especially
in developing nations, should lay more emphasis on

improving the existing
public
transport infrastructure
because
of its wider coverage, affordability and

inadequacy and terrible condition. Not
only
do the mass
transit
systems like railways, buses are
used


by larger section of
people
in the world
but
also
offers mode of
transit
both for passengers and freight

which in turn
makes
it a lifeline of transport system of any country. Horrific state such filthy premises,

poor hygienic conditions of stations or depots of present
public
mode of
transit
(
mainly
in developing

or third world nations)
makes
it
inarguably
essential for the governing bodies to prioritize funding in

this sector.

In my judgement, benefits of having bullet
trains
distinctively
and
certainly
cannot outweigh the

extensive advantages of upgrading the present system of mass
transit
because
of the scope it offers,

being pocket friendly and trickle-down benefits to
financially
weaker sections of the country. Higher

authorities,
therefore
, should allocate resources in this direction then spending it on
fast
trains
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay railways vs public transport

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
353 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts