The passage provides three possible solutions to hamper increasingly spread of cane toad in Australia. However, professor rejectes mentioned solutions and says that these solution will not be sucessful, and son they will damage environment.
First, the author of the passage imparts that a national fence avoids cane toad to spread. The lecturer, on the other hands states that fence never stop spreading of toads, since young toads and eggs carry through rivers and streams. As a result they will flow from one side to onother ones and their population will be established in other regions.
Second, the volunteers help to stop toad to spread by capturing and then destoy them, according to the article. The professor rejectes this view by explaining that volunteers are untrained, and they destroy native frogs. They are not able to distinguish between frogs, hence, they make numerous terrible consquences like those in the South america.
Third, the reading claims that producing virus is a reasonable solution to toad spreading cross autralia. The lecturer, on the contrary, repudiates this point by saying that some researchers have transfered virus to other regions which the virus attacked the native frogs. Since, the virus are a ecollogically disaster for ecosystem, they will endanger not only native species, but also whole ecosystem. 
The passage provides three possible  
solutions
 to hamper  
increasingly
 spread of cane  
toad
 in Australia.  
However
, professor  
rejectes
 mentioned  
solutions
 and says that these  
solution
 will not be  
sucessful
, and son they will damage environment. 
First
, the author of the passage imparts that a national fence avoids cane  
toad
 to spread. The lecturer, on the other hands states that fence never  
stop
 spreading of  
toads
, since young  
toads
 and eggs carry through rivers and streams.  
As a result
 they will flow from one side to  
onother
 ones and their population will  
be established
 in other regions.
Second, the volunteers  
help
 to  
stop
  toad
 to spread by capturing and then  
destoy
 them, according to the article. The professor  
rejectes
 this view by explaining that volunteers  
are untrained
, and they  
destroy
 native frogs. They are not able to distinguish between frogs,  
hence
, they  
make
 numerous terrible  
consquences
 like those in the  
South america
.
Third, the reading claims that producing  
virus
 is a reasonable  
solution
 to  
toad
 spreading cross  
autralia
. The lecturer,  
on the contrary
, repudiates this point by saying that  
some
 researchers have  
transfered
  virus
 to other regions which the  
virus
 attacked the native frogs. Since, the  
virus
 are  
a
  ecollogically
 disaster for ecosystem, they will endanger not  
only
 native species,  
but
  also
 whole ecosystem.