Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

permanent human being on the venus

permanent human being on the venus 850or
The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to impossibility of permanent human being residency on the Venus and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it can be possible with flooding station and opposes each of the author's reasons. First, the reading passage mention that atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than earth which makes travel to land to impossible due to they would be crushed under that amount of pressure. In contrary, the professor provides information that drawback that is related to pressure, might be overcome. He states that pressure level at 50 km up is equal the pressure on the earth, thus maintaining a flooding station in up sky will enable us to live there. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that higher level of Venus has lower pressures. Second, the reading passage pushes forth the idea that there is no water reservoir as well as oxygen at Venus. Nonetheless, the professor contend this, since many compounds are present at Venus such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen so on, these chemicals may be processed to generate water and oxygen. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated. Finally, the article posits that there is insufficient sun light due to thick cloud, minute of lights reach the ground at Venus. The professor refutes this points by explaining above 50 km, there are thin clouds so the flooding station can use more reflected sun light above and also below which can help to generate considerably electricity. In summary, while both the reading and the lecture provides interesting information with regard to Venus, a significant amount of evidence support that article are presenting much more legitimate and tangible factors. Hence, the lecture fails to justify the claim toward stand point of scientist in the reading.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to impossibility of permanent human being residency on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
and provides three reasons of support.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
that it can be possible with flooding station and opposes each of the author's reasons.

First
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage mention that atmospheric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pressure
is 90 times greater than earth which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
travel to land to impossible due to they would
be crushed
under that amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pressure
. In contrary, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
provides information that drawback that
is related
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pressure
, might
be overcome
. He states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pressure
level at 50 km up is equal the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pressure
on the earth,
thus
maintaining a flooding station in up sky will enable us to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
there.
Clearly
, a disparity exists between the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
and the evidence exhibited by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
.
As a result
, we can
safely
assume that higher level of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
has lower pressures.

Second, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage pushes forth the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that there is no water reservoir
as well
as oxygen at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
. Nonetheless, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
contend this, since
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
compounds are present at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on, these chemicals may
be processed
to generate water and oxygen.
Consequently
, we can argue that
indeed
the claim made in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
is unsubstantiated
.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
posits that there is insufficient sun light due to thick cloud, minute of lights reach the ground at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
refutes this points by explaining above 50 km, there are thin clouds
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
the flooding station can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more reflected sun light above and
also
below which can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to generate
considerably
electricity.

In summary, while both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
and the lecture provides interesting information with regard to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Venus
, a significant amount of evidence support that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
are presenting much more legitimate and tangible factors.
Hence
, the lecture fails to justify the claim toward stand point of scientist in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay permanent human being on the venus

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
317 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    electronic medical record storage
    The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to upsides of electronic databases to store medical information and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that all claims regarding this method is uncertain and opposes each of the author's reasons. First, the reading...
  • 5.5band
    it is important to know event all over the world, even if it is unlikely affect your life?
    This topic asked whether or not knowing regarding events happening around the world is important, even that does not affect my daily life. Certainly, some people if asked would agree with statement due to quite crucial to keep up with glob, while others would mention that question depends on a great...
  • 6band
    Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal. . . . .
    The reading discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to incapability of Pterosaurs which is an ancient time reptile and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that pterosaurs are indeed capable of fly and opposes each of the author's reasons. First, reading passage menti...
  • 6band
    Both the passage and the lecture discuss whether a girl on a painting is Janes Austen or not.
    Both the passage and the lecture discuss whether a girl on a painting is Janes Austen or not. According to the author, the girl on the painting is Austen for some reasons. The lecturer, however, does not agree with the author`s point of view. The first reason the author says that, Austen`s family l...
  • 6.5band
    Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether dinosaurs are endotherms or not.
    Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether dinosaurs are endotherms or not. The author thinks that dinosaurs are endotherms, the speaker, however, disagree with the author`s the point of view. The first reason the author says that, in polar regions some dinosaur fossils have been found, which...
  • 6band
    The lecture completely refutes the passage.
    The lecture completely refutes the passage. It is said in the lecture that predators are the cause of the decreased number of the otter population in a coast of Alaska. Pollution is not the main reason for this problem as the passage says. The passage points out that, pollution is main factor that ...





Get more results for topic:
  • permanent human being on the venus