The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to upsides of electronic databases to store medical information and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that all claims regarding this method is uncertain and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage mention that reducing cost is possible due to in electronic system, there is no need for space for paper record as well as no transferring effort. In contrary, the professor provides information that saving money is unrealistic. She states that even doctors who are adopt the computer, still use paper report in order for backup and legal requirement. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that merits of electronic databases can be neglected to its demerits.
Second, the reading pushes forth the idea that new technique lessens the chances of error owing to electronic system might interdict the errors the doctors make on paper. Nonetheless, the professor contends that, cannot diminish the mistakes. According to the professor, doctors take notes, write prescription and so on, afterward the information are entered to the system by assistant. If there are mistakes on paper, errors will already be in the system as well. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article posits that a vast number of patient's data may be utilized so as for aiding in research. The professor refutes this point by explaining that possibility is unlikely difficult and practical because there is so strict law that protects the patient record being used or collect without permission. We also learn that even a doctor intends to use, permission from the patient is necessitated as well as authority.
In summary, while both the reading and the lecture provide interesting information with regard to both upside and downside of way of storage of electronic and traditional medical records, a significant amount of evidence support that the professor presented more legitimate and tangible grounds. Hence, the reading passage fails to justify the claim towards stand point of the professor.
The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to upsides of
electronic
databases to store medical
information
and provides three reasons of support.
However
, the
professor
explains
that all claims regarding this method is uncertain and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First
, the
reading
passage mention that reducing cost is possible due to in
electronic
system
, there is no need for space for paper record
as well
as no transferring effort. In contrary, the
professor
provides
information
that saving money is unrealistic. She states that even
doctors
who are
adopt
the computer,
still
use
paper report in order for backup and legal requirement.
Clearly
, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the
professor
.
As a result
, we can
safely
assume that merits of
electronic
databases can
be neglected
to its demerits.
Second, the
reading
pushes forth the
idea
that new technique lessens the chances of error owing to
electronic
system
might interdict the errors the
doctors
make
on paper. Nonetheless, the
professor
contends that, cannot diminish the mistakes. According to the
professor
,
doctors
take notes, write prescription and
so
on, afterward the
information
are entered
to the
system
by assistant. If there are mistakes on paper, errors will already be in the
system
as well
.
Consequently
, we can argue that
indeed
the claim made in the
reading
is unsubstantiated
.
Finally
, the article posits that a vast number of patient's data may
be utilized
so
as for aiding in research. The
professor
refutes this point by explaining that possibility is unlikely difficult and practical
because
there is
so
strict law that protects the patient record being
used
or collect without permission. We
also
learn that even a
doctor
intends to
use
, permission from the patient
is necessitated
as well
as authority.
In summary, while both the
reading
and the lecture provide interesting
information
with regard to both upside and downside of way of storage of
electronic
and traditional medical records, a significant amount of evidence support that the
professor
presented more legitimate and tangible grounds.
Hence
, the
reading
passage fails to justify the claim towards stand point of the
professor
.