People have varying viewpoints about how government should spend its money. Although some people believe that stunning buildings are essential for a city, others believe that spending money on schools and hospital is more important. Given the fact that both views have merits, I would prefer the latter.
To begin, there are several reasons why fascinating structures are essential for a city. One of the reasons is that many cities are known for their impressively built landmark buildings. For example, when it comes to Petronas Twin Towers, people immediately think of Kuala Lumpur. That shows why they are so important and valuable. Another reason is that those structures have the potential to draw a large number of visitors. Many people may want to look and closely observe them by visiting, which brought significant income to help economic development in the region.
On the contrary, some people believe that spending money on erecting impressive buildings is unnecessary because meeting people's basic needs, such as access to education and health care, is more critical than constructing flashy structures. For instance, investment in health can increase the longevity and quality of life of people. Education is also important since it assists in the improvement of the human development index and promotes social stability.
Actually, I think the government should focus more on education and health. Education and health are the foundation of a nation. Only when education and health are developed can society stabilize and other economic indicators go up. Impressive buildings in cities only attract tourists when the city is stable and safe.
In short, both large buildings and education, healthcare provide significant benefits to the city. However, schools and hospitals should be given priority consideration because they provide indispensable services.
People
have varying viewpoints about how
government
should spend its money. Although
some
people
believe that stunning
buildings
are essential for a city, others believe that spending money on schools and hospital is more
important
.
Given
the fact that both views have merits, I would prefer the latter.
To
begin
, there are several reasons why fascinating structures are essential for a city. One of the reasons is that
many
cities
are known
for their
impressively
built landmark
buildings
.
For example
, when it
comes
to
Petronas
Twin Towers,
people
immediately
think
of Kuala Lumpur. That
shows
why they are
so
important
and valuable. Another reason is that those structures have the potential to draw
a large number of
visitors.
Many
people
may want to look and
closely
observe them by visiting, which brought significant income to
help
economic development in the region.
On the contrary
,
some
people
believe that spending money on erecting impressive
buildings
is unnecessary
because
meeting
people
's basic needs, such as access to
education
and
health
care, is more critical than constructing flashy structures.
For instance
, investment in
health
can increase the longevity and quality of life of
people
.
Education
is
also
important
since it assists in the improvement of the
human development index
and promotes social stability.
Actually, I
think
the
government
should focus more on
education
and
health
.
Education
and
health
are the foundation of a nation.
Only
when
education
and
health
are developed
can society stabilize and other economic indicators go up. Impressive
buildings
in
cities
only
attract tourists when the city is stable and safe.
In short, both large
buildings
and
education
, healthcare provide significant benefits to the city.
However
, schools and hospitals should be
given
priority consideration
because
they provide indispensable services.