Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

parents should be held legally responsible for children's act. What is your opinion ?

parents should be held legally responsible for children's act. What is your opinion? 562jQ

Who should be held responsible for the wrong actions of a child? Should care-takers be questioned about it or just the committer? I am of the opinion that parents are the only authority to look-after and train a child; therefore, who else could be blamed if not them? First of all, the character of the children certainly depends on the training they receive from their parents and they could be held legally responsible if their kid does anything illegal. To elaborate, a kid at a younger age learns what he sees during his upbringing because of the early age learning process. Consequently, if he would have spoiled at that part of the age and gained a detrimental experience, then the only individuals worth blaming are the parents. Therefore, the offence committed by a non-adult must be a legal offence of the parents as well. Additionally, most countries have no laws for the underage and in case of theft or some other mishap, only the guardians could be questioned. For example, in the USA the person under 18 is not an independent citizen, during this span of life, his care-takers have to cater and educate him. If a child within that age group is caught violating the law, his fosters would be arrested by the police along with the kid, resulting in a penalty or a fine to them. Hence, there is no other option left in such cases besides arresting the parents. In conclusion, it is often thought that parents should legally be questioned for the wrongdoings of their kids. In my perspective, it is certainly the only logical case, otherwise, a child could not be abided by the law. Furthermore, the responsibility of spoiling him fall on the guardians alone.

Who should be held
 responsible for the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 actions of a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinfanttoddleradolescentjuvenileyouthteenager
child
? Should care-takers be questioned
 about it or This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 the committer? I am of the opinion that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfathermother
parents
 are the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalone
only
 authority to look-after and train a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinfanttoddleradolescentjuvenileyouthteenager
child
; therefore
, who else could be blamed
 if not them?

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, the character of the children certainly
 depends on the training they receive from their Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).parents, and
parents and
 they could be held
legally
 responsible if their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboyinfantdaughtersonyouthteenager
kid
 does anything illegal. To elaborate, a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboyinfantdaughtersonyouthteenager
kid
 at a younger You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 learns what he This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnesses
sees
 during his upbringing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the early You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 learning process. Consequently
, if he Did you mean "had spoiled"?had spoiled
would have spoiled
 at that part of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 and gained a detrimental experience, then the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalone
only
 individuals worth blaming are the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfathermother
parents
. Therefore
, the Possible spelling mistake. 'offence' is British English.offense
offence
 committed by a non-adult This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be a legal Possible spelling mistake. 'offence' is British English.offense
offence
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfathermother
parents
as well
.

Additionally
, most countries have no laws for the underage and in case of theft or This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 other mishap, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalone
only
 the guardians could be questioned
. For example
, in the USA the person under 18 is not an independent citizen, during this span of life, his care-takers This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 cater and educate him. If a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinfanttoddleradolescentjuvenileyouthteenager
child
 within that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 group is caught
 violating the law, his fosters would be arrested
 by the police along with the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboyinfantdaughtersonyouthteenager
kid
, resulting in a penalty or a fine to them. Hence
, there is no other option This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :departed
left
 in such cases besides
 arresting the parents.

In conclusion
, it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfathermother
parents
 should legally
be questioned
 for the wrongdoings of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboyinfantdaughtersonyouthteenager
kids
. In my perspective, it is certainly
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalone
only
 logical case, otherwise
, a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinfanttoddleradolescentjuvenileyouthteenager
child
 could not be abided
 by the law. Furthermore
, the responsibility of spoiling him fall on the guardians alone. 