A newsletter offered an advice to stockholders to sell their shares and investors not to purchase stocks from Old Dairy Company. The author recommended this because the company sales are likely to decline and profits made by the company will reduce. However, as more light is shed on issues and more detailed facts are concerned, lack of answers through an argument, leads me to question its validity.
First of all, Is the survey conducted genuine? In other words, did the survey consulted people who are already obese or were they lean? It might happen that people who responded to survey might be having obesity so they tend to choose food which has less fat. There is a possibility that the questions in the survey were designed in such a way that people tend to choose the option of less fat. If the above scenarios are true, then the argument is weakened.
Secondly, do people actually follow the option which they have chosen in the survey? Maybe people just submitted the easy based on what is a healthy food but do they really change? Perhaps, people are tend to take low fat food but they might take fat foods to once in a while. If the above assumptions are valid, then argument does not hold water.
Finally, do Old Dairy Industries does not produce any other products other than high in fat and cholesterol food? Maybe there are other products too which are sold highly by Old Dairy Industries. Perhaps, the revenue generated by the Old Dairy industries is not solely based on the fat products. If the above scenarios are merit, then the strength of the recommendation can be weakened.
In conclusion, the argument, as it is stands now, is flawed. However, if the author proved necessary evidence and can answer above questions, then the argument can be possibly evaluated.
A newsletter offered
an advice
to stockholders to sell their shares and investors not to
purchase
stocks from
Old
Dairy
Company
. The author recommended this
because
the
company
sales are likely to decline and profits made by the
company
will
reduce
.
However
, as more light
is shed
on issues and more detailed facts
are concerned
, lack of answers through an
argument
, leads me to question its validity.
First of all
, Is the
survey
conducted genuine? In
other
words, did the
survey
consulted
people
who are already obese or were they lean? It might happen that
people
who responded to
survey
might be having obesity
so
they tend to choose
food
which has less
fat
. There is a possibility that the questions in the
survey
were designed
in such a way that
people
tend to choose the option of less
fat
. If the
above
scenarios are true, then the
argument
is weakened
.
Secondly
, do
people
actually follow the option which they have chosen in the
survey
? Maybe
people
just
submitted the easy based on what is a healthy
food
but
do they
really
change
? Perhaps,
people
are tend to take low
fat
food
but
they might take
fat
foods
to once in a while. If the
above
assumptions are valid, then
argument
does not hold water.
Finally
, do
Old
Dairy
Industries does not produce any
other
products
other
than high in
fat
and cholesterol
food
? Maybe there are
other
products too which
are sold
highly
by
Old
Dairy
Industries. Perhaps, the revenue generated by the
Old
Dairy
industries is not
solely
based on the
fat
products. If the
above
scenarios are merit, then the strength of the recommendation can
be weakened
.
In conclusion
, the
argument
, as it is stands
now
,
is flawed
.
However
, if the author proved necessary evidence and can answer
above
questions, then the
argument
can be
possibly
evaluated.