Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

online encyclopeidas

online encyclopeidas MMwmQ
The reading and the lecture are both about online encyclopedias. whereas the author of the reading states that it has several problems. , the lecutrer suggests that these problem are can be solved. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the article by providing three reasons. First of all, according to the reading, these users who enters information in encyclopedias lack in academic credentials. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that unlike the traditional online encylopedias can be monitored and correct any mistake in a matter of second not like the traditinonals which will remain for decades. Secondly, the passage states that hacking can be a big problem even if the information is right. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that some information in these are in read-only. In addition, she points out even the hacker can not edit these writing, also, there are people who monitor any edit made in the encyclopedias. Finally, the article claims that the readings in the encyclopedias are depth for the averge reader. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that you can find anything you want if it was in depth or not. She thinks that encyclopedias will help people what they want to know about.
The
reading
and the lecture are both about online encyclopedias.
whereas
the author of the
reading
states that it has several problems.
,
the
lecutrer
suggests that
these problem
are can
be solved
. The
lecturer
casts doubt on the main points made in the article by providing three reasons.

First of all
, according to the
reading
, these users who
enters
information in encyclopedias lack in academic credentials.
However
, the
lecturer
disputes this point. She says that unlike the traditional online
encylopedias
can
be monitored
and correct any mistake in a matter of second not like the
traditinonals
which will remain for decades.

Secondly
, the passage states that hacking can be a
big
problem even if the information is right.
Nevertheless
, the
lecturer
refutes this argument. She argues that
some
information in these are in read-
only
.
In addition
, she points out even the hacker can not edit these writing,
also
, there are
people
who monitor any edit made in the encyclopedias.

Finally
, the article claims that the
readings
in the encyclopedias are depth for the
averge
reader.
On the other hand
, the
lecturer
believe that you can find anything you want if it was in depth or not. She
thinks
that encyclopedias will
help
people
what they want to know about.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay online encyclopeidas

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
210 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: