Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

The term ' global warming' made some significant impact in peoples mind with relate to the energy sources they use. Most of the countries are heavily depending up on fossil fuels for power generation even though it is very harmful for our environment. As a result of global warming effects many countries considering nuclear power as an alternative solution for this problem and a good option for fulfilling the ever increasing energy requirement. I do agree with this thought to certain extent. On one hand, nuclear energy has many advantages as compared to traditional energy sources. Firstly, it is a renewable energy source, so we don't need to worry about the depletion and reserve factors. For instance, fossil fuels are non- renewable once, the more we use as fast it will become perish. Secondly, nuclear power is quite environment friendly, it doesn't emmit any carbon dioxide content in to the atmosphere. It is more cleaner energy than the traditional energy sources. Last but not least, atomic energy's mass to energy production is very high, which means with small amount of atomic content we can produce enough power to lighten the entire city. On the flip side of the coin. It does also have disadvantages as well. The contents of nuclear energy does make great threat to every living forms on the earth. It's radioactive waves or radiation causes deadly diseases like cancer, if it's contained properly. For example, Japan faced a catastrophe when the tsunamis struck one of it's nuclear power plant in Fukushima. As a result there was a leak in the plant, the area declared as radioactive zone, resulted in mass relocation of natives from that area. But still that area is kept as an quarantine area, indicating that no life forms survive over there. Moreover, the protection of nuclear power plants are very risky. Nowadays terrorist are aiming these kind of facilities as weapon of mass destruction. In conclusion, atomic energy is best solution to the energy deficiency that the world has facing right now. Also it is the perfect solution to the environmental problems that we are facing right now. Though there are some disadvantages as well, so proper running and establishment of these kind if facilities should be guaranteed.
The term
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
'
global warming' made
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
significant impact in peoples mind with relate to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
. Most of the countries are
heavily
depending up on fossil fuels for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
generation
even though
it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
harmful for our environment.
As a result
of global warming effects
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries considering nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
as an alternative solution for this problem and a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
option for fulfilling the
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
ever increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
requirement. I do
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
to certain extent.

On one hand, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
advantages as compared to traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
.
Firstly
, it is a renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
we don't need to worry about the depletion and reserve factors.
For instance
, fossil fuels are non- renewable once, the more we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
it will become perish.
Secondly
, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
is quite environment friendly, it doesn't
Possible spelling mistake found.
emmit
any carbon dioxide content in to the atmosphere. It is
Use only "cleaner" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
more cleaner
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
than the traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
. Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least, atomic energy's mass to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
high, which means with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
amount of atomic content we can produce
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
to lighten the entire city.

On the flip side of the coin. It does
also
have disadvantages
as well
. The contents of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
does
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
great threat to every living forms on the earth.
Did you mean "its radioactive waves"?
It's radioactive waves
or radiation causes deadly diseases like cancer, if it's contained
properly
.
For example
, Japan faced a catastrophe when the tsunamis struck one
Did you mean "of its nuclear"?
of it's nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
plant in Fukushima.
As a result
there was a leak in the plant, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
declared as radioactive zone, resulted in mass relocation of natives from that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
still
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
as
Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
an
quarantine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
, indicating that no life forms survive over there.
Moreover
, the protection of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
plants are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
risky. Nowadays terrorist are aiming
Did you mean "this kind" or "these kinds"?
these kind
of facilities as weapon of mass destruction.

In conclusion
, atomic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
A determiner is probably missing here: "is the best".
is best
solution to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
deficiency that the world has facing right
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Also
it is the perfect solution to the environmental problems that we are facing right
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
. Though there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
disadvantages
as well
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
proper running and establishment of these kind
Did you mean "of"?
if
facilities should
be guaranteed
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
374 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts