Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

The term ' global warming' made some significant impact in peoples mind with relate to the energy sources they use. Most of the countries are heavily depending up on fossil fuels for power generation even though it is very harmful for our environment. As a result of global warming effects many countries considering nuclear power as an alternative solution for this problem and a good option for fulfilling the ever increasing energy requirement. I do agree with this thought to certain extent. On one hand, nuclear energy has many advantages as compared to traditional energy sources. Firstly, it is a renewable energy source, so we don't need to worry about the depletion and reserve factors. For instance, fossil fuels are non- renewable once, the more we use as fast it will become perish. Secondly, nuclear power is quite environment friendly, it doesn't emmit any carbon dioxide content in to the atmosphere. It is more cleaner energy than the traditional energy sources. Last but not least, atomic energy's mass to energy production is very high, which means with small amount of atomic content we can produce enough power to lighten the entire city. On the flip side of the coin. It does also have disadvantages as well. The contents of nuclear energy does make great threat to every living forms on the earth. It's radioactive waves or radiation causes deadly diseases like cancer, if it's contained properly. For example, Japan faced a catastrophe when the tsunamis struck one of it's nuclear power plant in Fukushima. As a result there was a leak in the plant, the area declared as radioactive zone, resulted in mass relocation of natives from that area. But still that area is kept as an quarantine area, indicating that no life forms survive over there. Moreover, the protection of nuclear power plants are very risky. Nowadays terrorist are aiming these kind of facilities as weapon of mass destruction. In conclusion, atomic energy is best solution to the energy deficiency that the world has facing right now. Also it is the perfect solution to the environmental problems that we are facing right now. Though there are some disadvantages as well, so proper running and establishment of these kind if facilities should be guaranteed.

The term Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbolapply
' 
global warming' made This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 significant impact in peoples mind with relate to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
. Most of the countries are heavily
 depending up on fossil fuels for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 generation even though
 it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 harmful for our environment. As a result
 of global warming effects This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 countries considering nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 as an alternative solution for this problem and a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 option for fulfilling the This word is normally spelled with hyphen.ever-increasing
ever increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 requirement. I do This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 to certain extent.

On one hand, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 has This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 advantages as compared to traditional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
. Firstly
, it is a renewable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 we don't need to worry about the depletion and reserve factors. For instance
, fossil fuels are non- renewable once, the more we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 as This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
 it will become perish. Secondly
, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 is quite environment friendly, it doesn't Possible spelling mistake found.emit
emmit
 any carbon dioxide content in to the atmosphere. It is Use only "cleaner" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.cleaner
more cleaner
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 than the traditional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
. Last This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not least, atomic energy's mass to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 high, which means with This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 amount of atomic content we can produce This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 to lighten the entire city.

On the flip side of the coin. It does also
 have disadvantages as well
. The contents of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 does This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 great threat to every living forms on the earth. Did you mean "its radioactive waves"?Its radioactive waves
It's radioactive waves
 or radiation causes deadly diseases like cancer, if it's contained properly
. For example
, Japan faced a catastrophe when the tsunamis struck one Did you mean "of its nuclear"?of its nuclear
of it's nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 plant in Fukushima. As a result
 there was a leak in the plant, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
area
 declared as radioactive zone, resulted in mass relocation of natives from that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
area
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
still
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
area
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retained
kept
 as Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'a
an
 quarantine You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
area
, indicating that no life forms survive over there. Moreover
, the protection of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 plants are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 risky. Nowadays terrorist are aiming Did you mean "this kind" or "these kinds"?this kindthese kinds
these kind
 of facilities as weapon of mass destruction.

In conclusion
, atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
A determiner is probably missing here: "is the best".is the best
is best
 solution to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 deficiency that the world has facing right This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Also,
Also
 it is the perfect solution to the environmental problems that we are facing right This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
. Though there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 disadvantages as well
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 proper running and establishment of these kind Did you mean "of"?of
if
 facilities should be guaranteed
. 