Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Natural disasters have a greater impact on less economically developed countries(LEDCs) that more economically developed countries (MEDCs). How far do you agree with this statement?

Natural disasters have a greater impact on less economically developed countries(LEDCs) that more economically developed countries (MEDCs). How far VBQRO
Natural disasters have a greater impact on LEDCs than MEDCs in a number of different ways. People in low developed countries are more vulnerable considering the amount of lives lost, lack of a good healthcare system, economical difficulties, and last not least social aspects. In terms of the number of deaths, most people who die as a result of natural disasters are in LEDCs. For instance, earthquakes always cause more deaths in poor countries due to the undeveloped infrastructures. Here, in LEDCs, there is no enough fundamental structures, strong building and houses. People mostly inhabit in rural area where the land is cheap and week. From point of view of health impact, in many countries in Africa, Middle East, even in some part of Europe there is no a general healthcare system for public. The majority of people do not have an insurance and they are not able to take care of themselves in case of any disaster. It is also the case that, economically collapse is one of the most crucial impact when tragedy happens. Unfortunately, the cost of replacement is not affordable neither for people and nor for government. With respect to social issue, tourism which is an important part of a social growth in many LEDCs, can be particularly badly hit after, for example, the occurrence of Tsunamis, earthquakes, and storms. In conclusion, a comparison study of these two kind of countries, LEDCs and MEDCs, shows that in LEDCs the impact of natural disasters are more serious. Surely, people in LEDCs couldn’t survive without receiving supports and helps form MEDCs.
Natural disasters have a greater
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
impact
on
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
than
Possible spelling mistake found.
MEDCs
in a number of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
ways.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
in low developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
are more vulnerable considering the amount of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
lost, lack of a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
healthcare system,
Did you mean "economic" (=connected with economy)?
economical
difficulties, and last not
A determiner is probably missing here: "the least".
least
social aspects.

In terms of the number of deaths, most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
as a result
of natural disasters are in
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
.
For instance
, earthquakes always cause more deaths in poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
due to the undeveloped infrastructures. Here, in
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
, there is no
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
fundamental structures, strong building and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
mostly
inhabit in rural area where the land is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
and week.

From point of view of health
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
impact
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in Africa, Middle East, even in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
part of Europe there is
Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
no
a general healthcare system for public. The majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
do not have an
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
insurance and
they are not able to take care of themselves in case of any disaster.

It is
also
the case that,
economically
collapse is one of the most crucial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
impact
when tragedy happens. Unfortunately, the cost of replacement is not affordable neither for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and nor for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.

With respect to social issue, tourism which is an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
part of a social growth in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
, can be
particularly
badly
hit after,
for example
, the occurrence of Tsunamis, earthquakes, and storms.

In conclusion
, a comparison study of these two kind of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
MEDCs
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that in
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
impact
of natural disasters are more serious.
Surely
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
LEDCs
couldn’t survive without receiving supports and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
form
Possible spelling mistake found.
MEDCs
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Natural disasters have a greater impact on less economically developed countries(LEDCs) that more economically developed countries (MEDCs). How far

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
263 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Natural disasters have a greater impact on less economically developed countries(LEDCs) that more economically developed countries (MEDCs). How far do you agree with this statement?