Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?
Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from government in order for them to continue with their work.  GkBQ
In modern realety a number of creative people have not receive paiment for their job wich enagh for leaving. Autorities organise many programs, which supporting artists and they are capable to produce a lot of bright, spectaclular objects for us. As for me, without particolored, mugnifisent arts works our life will be dim and grey and support of arts is nesessary for all society.
Firstly, all times a lot of arts was leaving poor and during their life they painted interesting, breathtaking works, which was not sailed. Moreover, arts was obliged to be rageman or tramps and continued their life in poverty, however, after they death, most of their works became extra popular and in our time those objects able to cost a number of money. So, we do not capeble to know which of the arts will be famous in the future and government should provide encouragement for all of them.
Secondly, as arts create bright, particolored works and this objects produce benefits not only for painters, all sociaty receive a number of extra profits, when foreign tourists arrive to watch of it. Money, wich tourists pay for leaving or meal or transport, create a new work apportunity for citizens, whose are leaving in this area. So, one of the task for authorities is a supporting of the creative personalities and manage all opportunity for their works.
In conclusion, in uor life we have a number of examples, when art objects became famous and popular after death of their creaters and brange a huge fortune for the legatees of those arts. Moreover, a lot of art works are capable to earn high level of benefits for all sociaty and government should provide supporting progams for creative persons. 
In modern  
realety
 a  
number
 of creative  
people
 have not  
receive
  paiment
 for their job  
wich
  enagh
 for leaving.  
Autorities
  organise
  many
 programs, which supporting  
artists and
 they are capable to produce  
a lot of
 bright,  
spectaclular
  objects
 for us. As for me, without  
particolored
,  
mugnifisent
  arts
 works our  
life
 will be dim and  
grey
 and support of  
arts
 is  
nesessary
 for all society. 
Firstly
, all times  
a lot of
  arts
 was leaving poor and during their  
life
 they painted interesting, breathtaking works, which was not sailed.  
Moreover
,  
arts
  was obliged
 to be  
rageman
 or tramps and continued their  
life
 in poverty,  
however
, after  
they death
, most of their works became extra popular and in our time those  
objects
 able to cost a  
number
 of money.  
So
, we do not  
capeble
 to know which of the  
arts
 will be  
famous
 in the future and  
government
 should provide encouragement for all of them. 
Secondly
, as  
arts
 create bright,  
particolored
 works and this  
objects
 produce benefits not  
only
 for painters, all  
sociaty
 receive a  
number
 of extra profits, when foreign tourists arrive to  
watch
 of it. Money,  
wich
 tourists pay for leaving or meal or transport,  
create
 a new  
work
  apportunity
 for citizens, whose are leaving in this area.  
So
, one of the task for authorities is a supporting of the creative personalities and manage all opportunity for their works. 
In conclusion
, in  
uor
  life
 we have a  
number
 of examples, when  
art
  objects
 became  
famous
 and popular after death of their  
creaters
 and  
brange
 a huge fortune for the legatees of those  
arts
.  
Moreover
,  
a lot of
  art
 works are capable to earn high level of benefits for all  
sociaty
 and  
government
 should provide supporting  
progams
 for creative persons.