Although, many experts believe that for the development of a nation, an authority should spend more money to educate science rather than other courses. I think in a reverse manner and disagree with the given statement. My inclination is justified in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments, the foremost one to prove my opinion is, other subjects are also important in the country’s development. It cannot be denied that for a country to develop all possible subjects are equally important in their unique way. For example, accounts, management, history, languages, geography, statistics, and sports also play a crucial role to develop any country. This all together builds the strong economy of the particular country.
Another reason to prove my point is that other subjects can help to backup science. For instance, language is important for the explanation of the concept, history is used to explain how technology advanced over time. Moreover, all people do not incline science because this can lead to unemployment and discontent amongst people.
On the contrary, some people believe that science should get more funding from central authorities. They also believe that science is an epicenter of the progress of the nation. That is to say, developed countries like the United States have gain momentum mostly by funding a large number of science subjects. They spend money to make world-class labs in many schools.
Thus, to wrap up my discussion, it can be said that although science is the center of the process and development of a country, it would be impractical and illogical for the government to invest more only in this topic. My reason proves the importance of the subject too.
Although,
many
experts believe that for the development of a nation, an authority should spend more money to educate
science
rather
than other courses. I
think
in a reverse manner
and disagree with the
given
statement. My inclination
is justified
in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments, the foremost one to prove my opinion is, other
subjects
are
also
important
in the
country’s
development. It cannot
be denied
that for a
country
to develop all possible
subjects
are
equally
important
in their unique way.
For example
, accounts, management, history, languages, geography, statistics, and sports
also
play a crucial role to develop any
country
. This all together builds the strong economy of the particular country.
Another reason to prove my point is that other
subjects
can
help
to backup
science
.
For instance
, language is
important
for the explanation of the concept, history is
used
to
explain
how technology advanced over time.
Moreover
, all
people
do not incline
science
because
this can lead to unemployment and discontent amongst
people
.
On the contrary
,
some
people
believe that
science
should
get
more funding from central authorities. They
also
believe that
science
is an epicenter of the progress of the nation.
That is
to say, developed
countries
like the United States have gain momentum
mostly
by funding
a large number of
science
subjects
. They spend money to
make
world-
class
labs in
many
schools.
Thus
, to wrap up my discussion, it can
be said
that although
science
is the center of the process and development of a
country
, it would be impractical and illogical for the
government
to invest more
only
in this topic. My reason proves the importance of the
subject
too.