Money should be spent on creating new buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Money should be spent on creating new buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones.  5EjV
Each city has different types of buildings therein some are dilapidated and the government has spent more and more money to renovate them. However, if money is spent on building new establishments and destroying old one, it will be more profitable. Overall, I can partly agree with the topic statement because some old museums and town halls have historic value and replacing them with modern buildings destroy the integrity picture of history such constructions.
Firstly, few people can deny the fact that all buildings eventually are eroded, and regardless of what the government does, they will be destroyed. Therefore, debilitated constructions, perhaps, are better demolishing for diminishing waste of money. For example, it has been noticed that the more year old constructions the less help renovating and simultaneously has more cost. Consequently, if we replace such buildings on the new one it has the benefit in parts of comfort because new facilities are constructed by modern material, and less money is needed to be spent on them.
Nevertheless, many dilapidated constructions are ancient and have historic value in part of memory about our famous ancestors or the history of a city. In Poland, for instance, each city has an old centre where Town Hall was constructed with unique style, and it is simultaneously a museum, the seal of history and the place for many events. Likewise, all ancient buildings were constructed on a historically essential place, so new buildings do not have the same value for a country. Thus, the government would have to decide that constructions can demolish those that are not.
To conclude, each country has made its own decision about existing constructions. Notwithstanding, I believe that old buildings, which are monumental, need preservation as long as it is possible that partly correspond to the topic statement. 
Each city has  
different
 types of  
buildings
 therein  
some
  are dilapidated
 and the  
government
 has spent more and more  
money
 to renovate them.  
However
, if  
money
  is spent
 on  
building
  new
 establishments and destroying  
old
 one, it will be more profitable.  
Overall
, I can partly  
agree
 with the topic statement  
because
  some
  old
 museums and town halls have historic value and replacing them with modern  
buildings
  destroy
 the integrity picture of history such constructions. 
Firstly
, few  
people
 can deny the fact that all  
buildings
  eventually
  are eroded
, and regardless of what the  
government
 does, they will be  
destroyed
.  
Therefore
, debilitated  
constructions
, perhaps, are better demolishing for diminishing waste of  
money
.  
For example
, it has  
been noticed
 that the more year  
old
  constructions
 the less  
help
  renovating
 and  
simultaneously
 has more cost.  
Consequently
, if we replace such  
buildings
 on the  
new
 one it has the benefit in parts of comfort  
because
  new
 facilities  
are constructed
 by modern material, and less  
money
  is needed
 to  
be spent
 on them. 
Nevertheless
,  
many
 dilapidated  
constructions
 are ancient and have historic value in part of memory about our  
famous
 ancestors or the history of a city. In Poland,  
for instance
, each city has an  
old
  centre
 where Town Hall  
was constructed
 with unique style, and it is  
simultaneously
 a museum, the seal of history and the place for  
many
  events
.  
Likewise
, all ancient  
buildings
  were constructed
 on a  
historically
 essential place,  
so
  new
  buildings
 do not have the same value for a country.  
Thus
, the  
government
 would  
have to
 decide that  
constructions
 can demolish those that are not. 
To conclude
, each country has made its  
own
 decision about existing  
constructions
. Notwithstanding, I believe that  
old
  buildings
, which are monumental, need preservation as long as it is possible that partly correspond to the topic statement.