Specialized fields of education is more popular nowadays. Some believe that students who intend to enter into such fields of study should be funded by government and those who follow other subjects should be self-funded. In my opinion although, this may increase social disparity, the benefits to the individuals and society are far outweigh the minor drawbacks.
Government funding for one educational sector make other sectors unpopular. Free education policies are obviously more attractive and many students make their effort to reap that benefits by choosing such subject areas to study. This surely discourages other fields of education irrespective of their importance to the society. For example, many governments encourage health education and make necessary funding to promote such sector, so that demand for higher education in Engineering, Law and Management decreases. As a result while health sector of the country become well equipped with human resources, other sectors will be deteriorated. Despite this issue, I believe that pay more attention on high demanded sectors are extreamly reasonable.
Opportunity given for those who passionate in a particular field of study is utterly benefit for that sector. In other words, most of the time one who like to specialized in one subject, will not be able to persue his or her dreams because of higher university charges. For example, Times Education Report shows that many Australian students select to study their second choice when it comes to course selection at the university because their first choice of study, which is “Medicine” is unaffordable. Hence, such policies that motivate students to enter into high demanded career paths are advantageous to both the individual and the society. Therefore, I believe that educational funding for single area is more benefitial.
In conclusion, although sponsoring for particular subjects may escalate gaps in the job market, chances given to poor but excellent students to educate in their passionate field are far more valuable. Hence, it is recommended to continue such policies while minimizing minor detrimental effects.
Specialized
fields
of
education
is more popular nowadays.
Some
believe that
students
who
intend to enter into such
fields
of
study
should
be funded
by
government
and those
who
follow
other
subjects
should be self-funded. In my opinion although, this may increase social disparity, the benefits to the individuals and society are far outweigh the minor drawbacks.
Government
funding for one educational
sector
make
other
sectors
unpopular. Free
education
policies are
obviously
more attractive and
many
students
make
their effort to reap that benefits by choosing such
subject
areas to
study
. This
surely
discourages
other
fields
of
education
irrespective of their importance to the society.
For example
,
many
governments
encourage health
education
and
make
necessary funding to promote such
sector
,
so
that demand for higher
education
in Engineering, Law and Management decreases.
As a result
while health
sector
of the country become
well equipped
with human resources,
other
sectors
will
be deteriorated
. Despite this issue, I believe that pay more attention on high demanded
sectors
are
extreamly
reasonable.
Opportunity
given
for those
who
passionate in a particular
field
of
study
is
utterly
benefit for that
sector
. In
other
words, most of the time one
who
like to specialized in one
subject
, will not be able to
persue
his or her
dreams
because
of higher university charges.
For example
, Times
Education
Report
shows
that
many
Australian
students
select to
study
their second choice when it
comes
to course selection at the university
because
their
first
choice of
study
, which is “Medicine” is unaffordable.
Hence
, such policies that motivate
students
to enter into high demanded career paths are advantageous to both the individual and the society.
Therefore
, I believe that educational funding for single area is more
benefitial
.
In conclusion
, although sponsoring for particular
subjects
may escalate gaps in the job market, chances
given
to poor
but
excellent
students
to educate in their passionate
field
are far more valuable.
Hence
, it
is recommended
to continue such policies while minimizing minor detrimental effects.