As a sportslover, I look forward to sporting events. I take pride in mantaining my sporting events calendar. In the past few years, we have seen that
such events have been marred by controversy. There were protests in Brazil before the 2014 Rio Olympics and protests in India before the 2012 CommonWealth
Games. Should countries organise such spectacles?
Organizing a sports event offers many advantages to the host country. It is a matter of pride to be able to organize such large scale events.
These events also benefit
sportpersons of the home country. They tend to perform better. They compete in familiar environments and are supported by thousands of fans. Not surprisingly,
the Indian team won the 2011 Cricket World Cup that was held in India. Hosting a sports event also forces the host country to upgrade its
infrastructure: aiports, roads, hotels and stadiums.
However, there is another side to the story. Many people view the money spent on organizing these events as a waste of ressources.
Instead, the ressources should be allocated
to growing the economy and reducing unemployment. People in developing countries feel that the government should be spending money
on generating jobs and reducing poverty instead of spending on building sports stadiums. Corruption is also a concern. Large infrastructure contracts are
handed out in a shady manner. A huge scandal interrupted after the 2012 Commenwealth Games in India and the Head of the organizing committee had to tender his resignation.
As a sportslover, I believe that sports must go on. Sports is about never say die spirit, it is about competing hard and yet following the rules.
In a world where countries are embroiled in conflicts, sports events represent global solidarity. Atheletes from all over the world come together.
So countries should continue organizing such spectacles. As with any grand endeavor, there will always be risks and rewards.
As a
sportslover
, I look forward to sporting
events
. I take pride in
mantaining
my sporting
events
calendar. In the past few years, we have
seen
that
such
events
have
been marred
by controversy. There were protests in Brazil
before
the 2014 Rio Olympics and protests in India
before
the 2012
CommonWealth
Games. Should
countries
organise
such spectacles?
Organizing
a
sports
event
offers
many
advantages to the host
country
. It is a matter of pride to be able to
organize
such large scale
events
.
These
events
also
benefit
sportpersons
of the home
country
. They tend to perform better. They compete in familiar environments and
are supported
by thousands of fans. Not
surprisingly
,
the Indian team won the 2011 Cricket World Cup that
was held
in India. Hosting a
sports
event
also
forces the host
country
to upgrade its
infrastructure:
aiports
, roads, hotels and stadiums.
However
, there is another side to the story.
Many
people
view the money spent on
organizing
these
events
as a waste of
ressources
.
Instead
, the
ressources
should
be allocated
to growing the economy and reducing unemployment.
People
in developing
countries
feel that the
government
should be spending money
on generating jobs and reducing poverty
instead
of spending on building
sports
stadiums. Corruption is
also
a concern. Large infrastructure contracts
are
handed
out
in a shady manner
. A huge scandal interrupted after the 2012
Commenwealth
Games in India and the Head of the
organizing
committee had to tender his resignation.
As a
sportslover
, I believe that
sports
must
go on.
Sports
is about never say
die
spirit, it is about competing
hard
and
yet
following the
rules
.
In a world where
countries
are embroiled
in conflicts,
sports
events
represent global solidarity.
Atheletes
from all over the world
come
together.
So
countries
should continue
organizing
such spectacles. As with any grand endeavor, there will always be
risks
and rewards.