The reading passage claims that simulated meat would make our food better for the environment and people and presents several evidences that seem to uphold the claim. However, the lecture counterpoints that even if the product fulfills all the requirements, it is still unclear whether it would be as beneficial as mentioned in the reading passage. The reasons mentioned in the lecture will be elaborated in more detail below.
First of all, the lecture refutes the point made in the reading passage, which contends that simulated meat is better for the environment, by commenting that even if the product does require less land and provide less pollution, it still has negative consequences. Plant crops are grown with chemical fertilizers and pesticides which are detrimental to the environment. Also, rainforests are not cut down only with the sole purpose of raising livestock. People pursue such action to also exploit the land for farm crops.
Second, while the reading passage asserts that simulated meat is much healthier for people than consuming meat and meat products, the lecture disapproves this assertion by claiming that even though meat tend to have more fat, it also contains nutrients that are not found in vegetables. Also, it is unreasonable to maintain that simulated meat is healthier because it goes through multiple chemical processes such as inserting large amount of oil and sodium to mimic the taste of meat.
Last but not least, the reading passage contends that simulated meat is much safer because there is a lower chance of being contaminated with bacteria. However, the lecture counterpoints this evidence by mentioning that such claim is only partially true and is not entirely reasonable. Regarding the issue of allergic reations, while people can easily identify the origin of allergic reaction when consuming meat, it is extremely difficult to distinguish the reason to allergic reations in the case of simulated meat. Because people do not know all the ingredients that have been included in the product, they can easily show unexpected allergic reactions.
The
reading
passage
claims that simulated
meat
would
make
our food better for the environment and
people
and presents several evidences that seem to uphold the claim.
However
, the
lecture
counterpoints that even if the
product
fulfills all the requirements, it is
still
unclear whether it would be as beneficial as mentioned in the
reading
passage
. The reasons mentioned in the
lecture
will
be elaborated
in more detail below.
First of all
, the
lecture
refutes the point made in the
reading
passage
, which contends that simulated
meat
is better for the environment, by commenting that even if the
product
does require less land and provide less pollution, it
still
has
negative
consequences. Plant crops
are grown
with chemical fertilizers and pesticides which are detrimental to the environment.
Also
, rainforests are not
cut
down
only
with the sole purpose of raising livestock.
People
pursue such action to
also
exploit the land for farm crops.
Second, while the
reading
passage
asserts that simulated
meat
is much healthier for
people
than consuming
meat
and
meat
products
, the
lecture
disapproves this assertion by claiming that
even though
meat
tend to have more
fat
, it
also
contains nutrients that are not found in vegetables.
Also
, it is unreasonable to maintain that simulated
meat
is healthier
because
it goes through multiple chemical processes such as inserting large amount of oil and sodium to mimic the taste of meat.
Last
but
not least, the
reading
passage
contends that simulated
meat
is much safer
because
there is a lower chance of
being contaminated
with bacteria.
However
, the
lecture
counterpoints this evidence by mentioning that such claim is
only
partially
true and is not
entirely
reasonable. Regarding the issue of
allergic
reations
, while
people
can
easily
identify the origin of
allergic
reaction when consuming
meat
, it is
extremely
difficult to distinguish the reason to
allergic
reations
in the case of simulated
meat
.
Because
people
do not know all the ingredients that have
been included
in the
product
, they can
easily
show
unexpected
allergic
reactions.