Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? wBx8l
What is easier to pull down or to build? At present, it is argued that old buildings defended by the government should be replaced by modern constructions. Many historical objects are considered by the law to be one of the most essential determining parts of humanity’s heritage. This essay analyses the importance of keeping old walls and discussed historical influence on the breakthrough. Exploring old buildings allowed people to discover aspects of recorded roots and consequently boost cultural knowledge. It is worth saying that all objects from the past consist of meaningful messages which defined as priceless for the whole society. This is because, firstly, such ancient constructions represent valuable assets of various nations. In the last years, renovation research has provided ample support for the assertion that numerous historical discoveries have resulted directly from research of old buildings. Another essential point of protecting such buildings is transferring our records to the next generation to make it transparent and meaningful for years. In spite of that building modern skyscrapers have recently turned into an innovative mainstream in the majority of urban areas around the world, it does not mean that people have become more careless regarding historical centre. On the contrary, developing new objects, people constantly refer to their history, either to compare or emulate from past examples. In light of saving ancient architecture, renovating old parts of the cities is enhancing increasingly among different countries. Take for example Moscow, where a progressive way of development combines with cultural aspects and distinctively demonstrates historic periods of the country. To conclude, although presenting new constructions always brings changes and effects on cities' exterior, a cultural heritage should remain the same and be carefully protected by the law. In other words, building new walls should not begin by destroying old ones.
What is easier to pull down or to build? At present, it
is argued
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
defended by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should
be replaced
by modern constructions.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
objects
are considered
by the law to be one of the most essential determining parts of humanity’s heritage. This essay analyses the importance of keeping
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
walls and discussed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
influence on the breakthrough.

Exploring
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to discover aspects of recorded roots and
consequently
boost cultural knowledge. It is worth saying that all objects from the past consist of meaningful messages which defined as priceless for the whole society. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
,
firstly
, such ancient constructions represent valuable assets of various nations. In the last years, renovation research has provided ample support for the assertion that numerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
discoveries have resulted
directly
from research of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
. Another essential point of protecting such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
is transferring our records to the
next
generation to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it transparent and meaningful for years.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
In spite of
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
modern skyscrapers have recently turned into an innovative mainstream in the majority of urban areas around the world, it does not mean that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
have become more careless regarding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.
centre
.
On the contrary
, developing new objects,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
constantly
refer to their history, either to compare or emulate from past examples. In light of saving ancient architecture, renovating
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
parts of the cities is enhancing
increasingly
among
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
countries. Take
for example
Moscow, where a progressive way of development combines with cultural aspects and
distinctively
demonstrates historic periods of the country.

To conclude
, although presenting new constructions always brings
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
and effects on cities' exterior, a cultural heritage should remain the same and be
carefully
protected by the law.
In other words
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
new walls should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
by destroying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
ones.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
299 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts