Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. nr1o
Nowaday, many workplaces in developed countries are filled with third-quarter women, whereas most high-level positions are still owned by men. Hence, others said that managerial positions should provide for women. I believe that companies should provide these positions by knowledge and ability to work. Also, dividing some percent of chief executives to women does not gain equality.
First, companies must choose people to work in high-ranking positions by their potential, not by their gender. If companies hire employees by their gender, it can affect their work quality, profit, and company credit. Because some employees may not have knowledge and capability to be executives. Moreover, we need to accept the truth that not everybody can work well under pressure. The fact that more men working as high-level positions infer that they have skill and ability to do work.
Second, in the present, women are requiring feminism for equality, but is it reasonable enough to allocate high-ranking positions for women? Providing these positions for women cannot create equality in the workplace and society. Because dividing these positions for women can make some people think that they were just born as women so they can easily work in senior level positions.
It could be concluded that managerial positions should not be assigned for any gender but need to be based on their skill and potential. Furthermore, providing these positions does not mean that equality will appear in the workforce. If companies hire people with aptitude, proficiency, and do not divide gender, companies would be more effective.
Nowaday
,
many
workplaces in
developed countries
are filled
with third-quarter
women
, whereas most high-level
positions
are
still
owned
by
men
.
Hence
, others said that managerial
positions
should provide for
women
. I believe that
companies
should provide these
positions
by knowledge and ability to
work
.
Also
, dividing
some
percent of chief executives to
women
does not gain equality.
First
,
companies
must
choose
people
to
work
in high-ranking
positions
by their potential, not by their gender. If
companies
hire employees by their gender, it can affect their
work
quality, profit, and
company
credit.
Because
some
employees may not have knowledge and capability to be executives.
Moreover
, we need to accept the truth that not everybody can
work
well under pressure. The fact that more
men
working as high-level
positions
infer that they have
skill
and ability to do work.
Second, in the present,
women
are requiring feminism for equality,
but
is it reasonable
enough
to allocate high-ranking
positions
for
women
? Providing these
positions
for
women
cannot create equality in the workplace and society.
Because
dividing these
positions
for
women
can
make
some
people
think
that they were
just
born as
women
so
they can
easily
work
in senior level positions.
It could
be concluded
that managerial
positions
should not
be assigned
for any gender
but
need to
be based
on their
skill
and potential.
Furthermore
, providing these
positions
does not mean that equality will appear in the workforce. If
companies
hire
people
with aptitude, proficiency, and do not divide gender,
companies
would be more effective.