Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? LMrG
Due to modernisation, prevention of any fatal diseases is assured by vaccine. There is a debate that the children should be immunise forcefully by enforcing laws or the one can choose not to get vaccinated. The strict law of vaccination is directly effect the economy of the nation. However, the individual right is beneficial for family who are struggling with their livelihood. On one hand, the enforcement of strict law of making the children prevented from deadly disease have merits. If the government makes any law then it is compulsory to follow. In other words, that compulsion does not left with any option. As a result, the medication at the early stage of offspring make a healthy adult in future. Likewise, by following this rule the society also become disease free and there are more chances that people can work qualitatively. In addition, government do not have to spend excessive money on health sector thus the fund can be used in other area where the development is needed such as education. Thus this law can be beneficial for not only personally but also nationally. On the other hand, individual should have own right about their personal decision. Children are the responsibility of parents not of the government. Many people find hardship to support their family. The person who is underprivilege, do not consist even a basic demand like food and shelter. Thus, it can be impossible to make their children vaccinated and make them disease free. If some parent might think of vaccine for their juvenile, it would be unfeasible for them to arrange such amount. As person need to go for doses frequently for every fatal disease and it will be expensive afterwards. . Hence the family ended up with no choice than no vaccination to their child. In conclusion, parents who are unable to earn livelihood then become impossible to do vaccination so it should be guardian right whether to adopt this option. However, the implementation of law make sure about the health of upcoming generation and assist the country.
Due to
modernisation
, prevention of any fatal
diseases
is assured
by vaccine. There is a debate that the
children
should be
immunise
forcefully
by enforcing
laws
or the one can choose not to
get
vaccinated. The strict
law
of vaccination is
directly
effect the economy of the nation.
However
, the individual right is beneficial for family who are struggling with their livelihood.

On one hand, the enforcement of strict
law
of making the
children
prevented
from deadly
disease
have merits. If the
government
makes
any
law
then it is compulsory to follow.
In other words
, that compulsion does not
left
with any option.
As a result
, the medication at the early stage of offspring
make
a healthy adult
in future
.
Likewise
, by following this
rule
the society
also
become
disease
free and there are more chances that
people
can work
qualitatively
.
In addition
,
government
do not
have to
spend excessive money on health sector
thus
the fund can be
used
in other area where the development
is needed
such as education.
Thus
this
law
can be beneficial for not
only
personally
but
also
nationally
.

On the other hand
, individual should have
own
right about their personal decision.
Children
are the responsibility of parents not of the
government
.
Many
people
find hardship to support their family. The person who is
underprivilege
, do not consist even a basic demand like food and shelter.
Thus
, it can be impossible to
make
their
children
vaccinated and
make
them
disease
free. If
some
parent might
think
of vaccine for their juvenile, it would be unfeasible for them to arrange such amount. As person need to go for doses
frequently
for every fatal
disease
and it will be expensive afterwards.
.
Hence
the family ended up with no choice than no vaccination to their child.

In conclusion
, parents who are unable to earn livelihood then become impossible to do vaccination
so
it should be guardian right whether to adopt this option.
However
, the implementation of
law
make
sure about the health of upcoming generation and assist the country.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
342 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts