The author of this memo assumes that changing in shower-heads of three building to save more water. He states that this system has diminished water consuming to one-third. The close scrutiny of this memo reveals that all mentioned assumptions are based on doubtful proposition.
First of all, the argument relies on unfair assumptions that there were a few complaints about low water pressure in the buildings. The author provides no firm evidence that this is the case. A few number of complaints does not means that residents satisfied with new system, since the author says that they establish this system for one week. It is possible that in long time number of complain for this system will be increases, or perhaps resident are not in their home and they consume little water in that period. To strengthen this point we should see that in the long run how the shower-heads work to justify this argument even handy.
Second, the writer assumes that saving water in three building result in new system and changing of shower-heads in first three building. The author fails to consider there are numerous factors affecting this assumptions such as, amount of consume in first three buildings are related to their occupation and job, for example, an extended family needs more water than a small family. It is plausible to assume that residents of these three buildings use little water to wash their dishes and clothes and wash them all in other places.
The arguer states that this is a favorable plan to establish these shower-heads to other twelve buildings in the apartment. The arguer fails to see that efficiency of a shower-head for three buildings does not necessarily mean that they work for other. As the author states that the corporation established this system to first three buildings. It is possible that water pressure in these buildings is suitable, and residents have no problem with water shortage. Or perhaps the shower-heads of current buildings are modern and they do not require new system since there is no report from their deficiency in the current system.
To sum up, based on questionable assumptions and poor evidence, the author's reasoning does not provide concrete evidence to support his argument. To bolster this argument the author must provide more categorical information about activity of residents and their water pressure before and after setting new shower-heads.
The
author
of this memo assumes that changing in shower-heads of three
building
to save more
water
. He states that this
system
has diminished
water
consuming to one-third. The
close scrutiny
of this memo reveals that all mentioned
assumptions
are based
on doubtful proposition.
First of all
, the
argument
relies on unfair
assumptions
that there were a few complaints about low
water
pressure in the
buildings
. The
author
provides no firm evidence that this is the case. A
few number
of complaints does not
means
that
residents
satisfied with
new
system
, since the
author
says that they establish this
system
for one week. It is possible that in long time number of
complain for
this
system
will be increases, or perhaps
resident
are not in their
home and
they consume
little
water
in that period. To strengthen this point we should
see
that in the long run how the shower-heads work to justify this
argument
even handy.
Second, the writer assumes that saving
water
in three
building
result in
new
system
and changing of shower-heads in
first
three
building
. The
author
fails to consider there are numerous factors affecting
this
assumptions
such as, amount of consume in
first
three
buildings
are related
to their occupation and job,
for example
, an extended family needs more
water
than a
small
family. It is plausible to assume that
residents
of these three
buildings
use
little
water
to wash their dishes and clothes and wash them all in other places.
The arguer states that this is a favorable plan to establish these shower-heads to other twelve
buildings
in the apartment. The arguer fails to
see
that efficiency of a shower-head for three
buildings
does not
necessarily
mean that they work for other.
As
the
author
states that the corporation established this
system
to
first
three
buildings
. It is possible that
water
pressure in these
buildings
is suitable, and
residents
have no problem with
water
shortage. Or perhaps the shower-heads of
current
buildings
are
modern and
they do not require
new
system
since there is no report from their deficiency in the
current
system.
To sum up, based on questionable
assumptions
and poor evidence, the author's reasoning does not provide concrete evidence to support his
argument
. To bolster this
argument
the
author
must
provide more categorical information about activity of
residents
and their
water
pressure
before
and after setting
new
shower-heads.