Some people say that the government ought to allocate more of their budget to rail than roadways so in this essay I'm going to write about the topic by giving some examples based on my own knowledge
On the one hand investing in a modern train system will mean that people can get around a country faster. This is because train passengers do not have to deal with the congestion most road users experience and trains can achieve much higher speeds than cars. Therefore, people will spend less time commuting and more time doing something more productive and this will benefit the entire society. For example, the Uzbek Government recently unveiled plans to connect cities in the North of Tashkent with East óf the City via a high-speed rail network and this will reduce commuting times by half, allowing thousands of people in the Tashkemt to work in it
On the other hand Locomotives tend to be less harmful to the environment than cars. This is due to the fact that a train can carry hundreds of passengers and this prevents the use of hundreds of internal combustion engines, thus reducing the number of carbon emissions. If this is repeated every day over many different routes, the reduction in carbon footprint is highly significant. For instance, Tashkent city has recently opened its first underground metro service and this has reduced the number of cars and motorbikes on the road. One of the main benefits to the city will be an improvement in carbon dioxide levels because of the reduction in traffic.
Taking everything into consideration I can be totally agreed to statement because of saying that the State should divert more money to railway systems and spend less on road transportation as this will improve journey times and also be less harmful to the environment.
Some
people
say that the
government
ought to allocate more of their budget to rail than roadways
so
in this essay I'm going to write about the topic by giving
some
examples based on my
own
knowledge
On the one hand investing in a modern
train
system will mean that
people
can
get
around a country faster. This is
because
train
passengers do not
have to
deal with the congestion most road users experience and
trains
can achieve much higher speeds than cars.
Therefore
,
people
will spend
less
time
commuting and more
time
doing something more productive and this will benefit the entire society.
For example
, the Uzbek
Government
recently unveiled plans to connect
cities
in the North of Tashkent with East
óf
the City via a high-speed rail network and this will
reduce
commuting
times
by half, allowing thousands of
people
in the
Tashkemt
to work in
it
On the other hand
Locomotives tend to be
less
harmful to the environment than cars.
This is due to the fact that
a
train
can carry hundreds of passengers and this
prevents
the
use
of hundreds of internal combustion engines,
thus
reducing the number of carbon emissions. If this
is repeated
every day over
many
different
routes, the reduction in carbon footprint is
highly
significant.
For instance
, Tashkent city has recently opened its
first
underground metro service and this has
reduced
the number of cars and motorbikes on the road. One of the main benefits to the city will be an improvement in carbon dioxide levels
because
of the reduction in traffic.
Taking everything into consideration I can be
totally
agreed
to statement
because
of saying that the State should divert more money to railway systems and spend
less
on road transportation as this will
improve
journey
times
and
also
be
less
harmful to the environment.