Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for

Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for JoQwk
The reading and the lecture are both about the question whether or not apes can communicate by the use language. The author of the reading feels that apes can communicate though not with the use of verbal language The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that more evidence is required to make a valid conclusion about communication of apes. To begin with, the author argues that apes are able to share their emotions even though they lack the physical apparatus. The article mentions that the apes have learned to react and show different emotions based on other means of communication. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. he claims that the evidence of apes communicating are not scientifically proven. Additionally, he says as we are able unable to find how humans learn to communicate and because of this we cannot compare the two organisms. Secondly, the writer says that koko and her friend Michael were able to understand the sound. In the article, it is said that koko was even able to understand the poem written on her and both of them were able to differentiate similar sounding words very aptly. The lecturer, however rebut this by mentioning that language has a definition which does not comply with language of apes. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that the language used by humans is used creatively which includes pauses and comment over one another but such conditions are absent in the language of apes. Moreover, he undermines the conclusion drawn by researchers on animals that they might have some emotional attachment towards animals which is making them to give such vague conclusion. Finally, the author posits that apes can learn the sign language and can perform better than human children. moreover, in the article it is stated that Washoe whose upbringing done as if she was deaf, successfully translated the American sign language. Apart from this, Kanzi another ape, who was taught symbols along with children performed even better than human children in the tests. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that as of now no argument can be made whether or not apes are able to communicate. However, a conclusive statement can be given using MRI we can compare the functioning of the human brain and apes brain, and if they appears similar then they communicate otherwise not.
The reading and the lecture are both about
the question whether
or not
apes
can
communicate
by the
use
language
. The
author
of the reading feels that
apes
can
communicate
though not with the
use
of verbal
language
The lecturer challenges the claims made by the
author
. He is of the opinion that more evidence
is required
to
make
a valid conclusion about communication of apes.

To
begin
with, the
author
argues that
apes
are
able
to share their emotions
even though
they lack the physical apparatus. The article mentions that the
apes
have learned to react and
show
different
emotions based on other means of communication.
this
specific argument
is challenged
by the lecturer.
he
claims that the evidence of
apes
communicating are not
scientifically
proven.
Additionally
, he says as we are
able
unable to find how
humans
learn to
communicate
and
because of this
we cannot compare the two organisms.

Secondly
, the writer says that
koko
and her friend Michael were
able
to understand the sound.

In the article, it
is said
that
koko
was even
able
to understand the poem written on her and both of them were
able
to differentiate similar sounding words
very
aptly
. The lecturer,
however
rebut this by mentioning that
language
has a definition which does not comply with
language
of
apes
. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that the
language
used
by
humans
is
used
creatively
which includes pauses and comment over one another
but
such conditions are absent in the
language
of
apes
.
Moreover
, he undermines the conclusion drawn by researchers on animals that they might have
some
emotional attachment towards animals which is making them to give such vague conclusion.

Finally
, the
author
posits that
apes
can learn the
sign
language
and can perform better than
human
children.
moreover
, in the article it
is stated
that
Washoe
whose upbringing done as if she was deaf,
successfully
translated the American
sign
language
. Apart from this,
Kanzi
another
ape
, who
was taught
symbols along with children performed even better than
human
children in the
tests
.
In contrast
, the lecturer's position is that as of
now
no argument can
be made
whether or not
apes
are
able
to
communicate
.
However
, a conclusive statement can be
given
using MRI we can compare the functioning of the
human
brain and
apes
brain, and if they
appears
similar then they
communicate
otherwise
not.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
400 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: