Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies . However , some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods . To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. 1RLM
Big organizations are mostly prefer to take interviews for selecting employees. Although, some individuals claim that there are more preferable procedures to appoint workers for jobs. I largely disagree with this statement because social skills and personal traits are more beneficial for choosing a good employee. To commence with, a face to face communication helps to analyse the social skills of a person. Strong social skills can enable interpersonal interactions which can in turn lead to effective job outcomes. To illustrate, in direct interview, interviewers can asking some study type questions to judge abilities like to handle pressure, communication skills and think outside the box. Thus, interviews are beneficial to judge the social skills of workers. Secondly, another reason for taking direct contact is to judge the person's personal traits. It reflect people's characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings and behaviour. To elaborate, a person who is taking a interview can easily judged the personality traits such as body language, gestures, IQ level, self - confidence and so on. Hence, face to face interaction is essential for analysing private traits. On the contrary, there are multifarious methods to appoint an individual on a job which includes phone communication, written applications, resume screening, etc. For example, by written tests or CV screening, interviewers can know about that person is in the particular field and have experience also. Therefore, for choosing a good worker, there are some other reasonable techniques. To conclude, although there are numerous procedures to nominate employees. Yet, I believe that face to face communication is better option than other strategies.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Big
organizations are
mostly
Consider using a past participle here: "preferred".
prefer
to take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
for selecting employees. Although,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
individuals claim that there are more preferable procedures to appoint workers for jobs. I
largely
disagree with this statement
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
and personal traits are more beneficial for choosing a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
employee.

To commence with, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
to
Possible spelling mistake. 'analyse' is British English.
analyse
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
of a person. Strong
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
can enable interpersonal interactions which can in turn lead to effective job outcomes. To illustrate, in direct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
, interviewers can asking
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
study type questions to judge abilities like to handle pressure,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
outside the box.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are beneficial to judge the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
of workers.

Secondly
, another reason for taking direct contact is to judge the person's personal traits. It
Did you mean "reflects"?
reflect
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings and
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
. To elaborate, a person who is taking
Use "an" instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
can
easily
The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: "judge"
judged
the personality traits such as body language, gestures, IQ level, self
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
confidence and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on.
Hence
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
interaction is essential for
Possible spelling mistake. 'analysing' is British English.
analysing
private traits.

On the contrary
, there are multifarious methods to appoint an individual on a job which includes phone
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
, written applications, resume screening, etc.
For example
, by written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
or CV screening, interviewers can know about that person is in the particular field and have experience
also
.
Therefore
, for choosing a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
worker, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
other reasonable techniques.

To conclude
, although there are numerous procedures to nominate employees.
Yet
, I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
is better option than other strategies.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
261 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies . However , some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods . To what extent do you agree or disagree?